You know?
They (the Democratic Party) COULD absolutely blow this election out of the water...
But, NOOOOOOOOOOOO, they have to come up with Hillary and Obama, which will NEVER happen.
They have Hillary....yeah...that's just what we need...Bush Clinton Bush Clinton…then what Jeb Bush?? Why don't you people just crown them already...
Then there is Obama...who has NO experience and is already talking about going into Pakistan....Aren't we already in a war that no one wants to be in?
Can't you people find ONE good candidate? You mean to tell me that the Dems HAVE this next election and THIS is the best that they could find?????
Are the Dems on a secret mission to get another Republican elected? If they are, and they keep these two...you succeeded in your mission!!!!
2007-08-01 08:16:42 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Ohhh yeah....I forgot...since I don't like either of them....I MUST be a Republican...
Yeah....that's right....
2007-08-01 08:21:14 · update #1
ROTFLMAO!!!
You got that right. Hilary has to be the phoniest person on the planet....hey.....wait.....I just picked up some new material for my next question. Thanks!
RON PAUL 2008
RON PAUL 2008
RON PAUL 2008
RON PAUL 2008
RON PAUL 2008
2007-08-01 08:29:41 · answer #1 · answered by Honey Girl 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think because you don't like them that you may be blind to so many who do. How can you fail to see the support that Sen. Clinton has been garnering lately? She holds the highest percentage of approval for any candidate from any of the fields. She just keeps getting stronger and stronger and garnering more support as every week goes by. Not liking her is one thing, but ignoring the obvious is something else again. The Republicans favorite candidate is "None of the Above." They are going to need a miracle to win in '08, no matter who the Democratic candidate is. You know that famous 50% number of Americans who wouldn't vote for Hillary? It's dropped to 34% in the last month. And today, the Wall Street Journal announced her rising to 43% approval just since the last polls were taken.
Clinton tears ahead in Democrat presidential race: poll
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070801/ts_alt_afp/usvote2008_070801135219
Sorry that you don't like the Democratic candidates, but I really think that your own dislike has led you to ignore what so many others see - that the Democrats have a winner in Clinton. And if they decide to run Clinton/Obama, the Republicans may as well stay at home on Election Day. Right now that is a realistic reading of this country's mood.
2007-08-01 08:30:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
what are you talking about those are thier trump cards. a blackman and a woman in todays world. It doesn't get any better than that. Do you have some guy waitig in the wings who will blow us away. Was Edwards going to do something he hasn't done the last 2 times he tried. The mudslinging about them is because they are the leaders. No one talks about republicans at all. It's all part of the game. You'll do well to accept the rules.
you can live in a world where these people just came out from under a rock or you can understand why some other people you never seen before put them there.
2007-08-01 08:22:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton's have money and power. They were already there waiting to be in the lead. Obama is a charismatic speaker, no experience, no baggage. I'm sure he will make a better president than Bush.
Look at last election. 2004 should have been a slam dunk and they nominate John Kerry. I lost faith in the Dems with that one.
2007-08-01 08:24:15 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Did you watch old Cheney on Larry King last night, tell about all he is over and what all he is head of, we could win hands down with a by just stating Vote Democrat, just Vote Democrat you will be taken care of and get those fat as* whiners out of our face. Cheney is the biggest pile of BS that ever existed , he doesn't deserve that 15 % his family gives him. I often wonder what his mother and dad was like , no one would have a complete nothing for a baby. They should have just knocked him in the head like they did in those years he was born in and buried him deep rolled up in some old cloth. He would killed all the grass around him, it couldn't grow on top of that nuclear mess.
2007-08-01 08:29:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
So your problem with Hillary is that we've had Bushes and a Clinton in charge the past 20 years? And with Obama its his admittedly limited (Different than no, and not much different than GWB) experience and desire to go after the perpetrators of 9/11?
I think you answered your question. There's no real problem with either of these two candidates, so that's why they're running.
2007-08-01 08:22:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No. I tell lies to my shoppers every time i circulate to artwork, infront of my colleagues and with the understanding and approval of my boss. in case you disapprove then you truly tell me the thank you to calm an eighty 4 365 days previous widow who's hysterical approximately getting domicile by way of fact she had slightly one the day previous and her husband would not comprehend the thank you to look after it. My reaction to her is that she is staying with us to get better, she would be able to no longer be any solid to the toddler if she is going domicile and collapses and that i've got sent a nurse to help her husband.
2016-10-13 09:29:19 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Anyone who supports a field that includes Adolph Giuliani, Mitt the Twit Romney and John (I'll do anything to still be called a hero) McCain looks very silly commenting on the Democratic field.
2007-08-01 08:22:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Look at their popularity ratings.
Hillary has a higher popularity among Democratic voters than the top two Republican candidates COMBINED.
And even Obama as the second place has a higher popularity rating than the Republican front-runner.
So, as a political strategy to get their base interested, it's a smart move.
2007-08-01 08:22:30 · answer #9 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I have to agree with you. I'm a liberal and I'd like to see a Democratic candidate assume the oval office, but right now the front-runners are, in my mind, weak candidates.
I think that a Dem will win it, thanks to the Republicans, but not 'because' of the Dem candidates. And of all the Dem Candidates I'd have to say that Edwards is the most substantial.
2007-08-01 08:22:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I was thinking the same of the Republicans but it has always been this way. They only good candidates are either not in the race yet or have anemic pole numbers. People of both parties are stupid. Maybe we should have a 3rd party of smart people.
2007-08-01 08:23:07 · answer #11 · answered by wisemancumth 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋