2007-08-01 07:25:41 · 13 answers · asked by . 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Sure, her nanny will probably do most of the child rearing anyway. The only time you see celebs with their kids are on special occassions. The images that we see in the media just make us think that they are always with them. For the most part, I wouldn't worry. I think her kids will be taken care of by a competent nanny.
2007-08-01 07:37:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, Personally I don't even know what in the world is happening to her. I can't even call her Britany Spears, because the Brttany that I once like 10 years ago knew was singing "Oops I did it again". But know her life is just going down the drain and she is becoming more famous everyday for shaving her head and partying like a maniac. I would say no way to that question I mean she can't even take care of herself how in the world can she take care of two boys. Every one hated K Fed because people thought that he was ruining her life but i think she is ruining her own life and she just doesn't deserve anything. we should just not even bother her and let her do all the stupid things she wants without getting richer. So K Fed should definitely have the kids but if it were me I would just give them to someone else who actually knows how to take care of kids. Like Angelina Jolie. Wow that was a long answer, I hope I answered your question.
2007-08-01 14:40:35 · answer #2 · answered by Niki S. 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know her personally, but primarily based on what I've heard, I'd have to go with no. I'd be willing to change my mind if, somehow, things were proven different, but for now, I don't think Britney should even have kids. She's really lost it.
2007-08-01 14:47:31 · answer #3 · answered by Alexandra H 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No she's messed up. Then again I dont think K-Fed deserves full custody of the kids either. I think Angelina Jolie should adopt them.
2007-08-01 14:44:46 · answer #4 · answered by Drew 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not? Kids are usually better off w/their Moms. Unless a Parent is neglectful or abusinve the child(ren) should always be w/ their Mom. Moms are more nurturing then most Dads.
2007-08-01 14:36:36 · answer #5 · answered by devilish1965 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the tabloids and everybody else would leave the woman alone, she might be able to raise her children in peace. She's a mediocre entertainer who needs her space (just like the rest of us do).
2007-08-01 14:41:40 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I can't really judge that although I do feel for her kids. Don't you find it funny that through all of her craziness K-Fed has now become the responsible voice of reason?
2007-08-01 14:29:45 · answer #7 · answered by MARS 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Just because you have money doesn't make you a good mother. Who is taking care of her baby anyways? I mean, she seems to be doing a very good job at not taking care of herself.
2007-08-01 17:30:27 · answer #8 · answered by PuzzledGuy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At this point in her life, no. She should want her children in a stable, safe environment and that is something that she has not and is not providing for them.
2007-08-01 14:44:43 · answer #9 · answered by Jade | My Brain is My Shepherd 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. It just proves once again that money equals power, and power gets special treatment...even white trash with money.
2007-08-01 14:33:00 · answer #10 · answered by Tom K 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋