Learning multiplication tables, honestly, was the most satisfying accomplishment I've had in math.
After that, it seemed, there was just an unending avalanche of more math to learn. It's occasionally satisfying to prove something, but I don't recall *learning* how to prove to be that great.
2007-08-01 06:55:35
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
After reading several questions about the clock hands lining up, I derived a Formula for when this happens to the nearest second :
X : (60X) / 11 : (60 times remainder) / 11
For example :
3 : 180 / 11 = 16 : (remainder of 4 x 60) / 11 = 22
The hands line up after 3 o'clock at 3 : 16 : 22 to the nearest second.
2007-08-01 18:07:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Don E Knows 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I could understand some theorems on Measure Theory and Lebesgue Integral. I got happy
2007-08-01 14:54:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Steiner 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
to understand surface integrals (2 variables only), It's a little achievement, but enough for my work.
I know I have to learn a lot more, I will be happy when I will not struggle trying to understand equations in string theory scientific papers.
2007-08-01 13:56:13
·
answer #4
·
answered by scientific_boy3434 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have derived some formulae like sum of the interior angles of an n-sided polygon, sum of the exterior angles of a polygon with n reflex angles, etc.
your_guide123@yahoo.com
2007-08-01 14:01:59
·
answer #5
·
answered by Prashant 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
2+2=5 .......OOps!!!
2007-08-01 13:53:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rip Van W 3
·
0⤊
0⤋