I am especially looking for things were he and his administration were accused or suspected of doing something, and they denied it, denied it, even ridiculed the suspects as Bush haters...but come to find out 6 months later, 1 year later, 2 years later, etc...bits of info start to dribble in and eventually facts are that those suspicions were right on.....and that in effect we were being lied to or bamboozled or kept in the dark? Please your favorite such instances.
2007-08-01 06:27:43 · 12 answers · asked by ez f 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Uniter, not divider.
No interest in nation building.
Bring honor and dignity back to the White House.
Either you are with us or against us.
Will hunt down the perpetrator of 9/11 and bring them to justice.
Compassionate Conservative
Anyone involved in leaking the identity of a covert CIA agent within the administration would be fired.
You need to trust me.
Al Qaeda in Iraq are the same people responsible for 9/11.
If you vote for a Democrat you are going to die (paraphrased and embellished, of course)
2007-08-01 06:31:16 · answer #1 · answered by R8derMike 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Best case is the Terri Schiavo case. Bush really wanted to use this to get his judges appointed. He made up the story that lib activist judges were going to kill this innocent girl. Hannity and Fox drug out some con-man that claimed to be a neurologist and said she could be cured. Then the scam blew up when Michael Schiavo did the autopsy and confirmed what the real docs and courts had been saying all along - the woman was brain-dead and the Fox/Rush/Savage/Bush con artists were just using her.
Good proof Bush will lie and use people to get his pro-Haliburton judges appointed. If he would lie about this, he would lie about WMD's.
2007-08-01 06:34:56 · answer #2 · answered by expose_neocons 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Clinton grew to become into top; Iraq had WMD at that element. The international community addressed that with sanctions and inspections. It grew to become into no longer achieveable to comprehend with actuality whether or no longer they nonetheless had any because of the fact they did no longer completely cooperate with the inspections, even though it grew to become into sparkling that they did no longer represent an instantaneous danger to the U. S., and the UN did no longer authorize militia action, because of the fact the approach gave the impression to be working. The invasion grew to become into as a result unlawful, and because it grew to become out, if Iraq did have any WMD's left, there have been no longer very many, as none have been ever discovered. The Democrats who went alongside with the invasion acted as badly because of the fact the Republicans. it is the reason Hillary Clinton isn't President.
2016-10-08 23:53:11 · answer #3 · answered by ulberg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) torture was denied, it was eventually proven true, and that Bush himself wanted it.
2) rumors surfaced of a massive illegal warrantless spying operation on american citizens, and denied. It was later proven true, and we still are now finding out that its even bigger than we thought.
3) rumors surfaced of secret american jails overseas and that prisoners were transported to other countries to be tortured. This is now know to be a fact.
4) The valerie plame case was denied, but now we know the orders came from the top.
5) We were told Iraq had WMD, and it did not
6) We were told Iraq was in cohoots with alqueda, it was not
7) We were told Iraq plotted in on the 9/11 attacks. It did not
8) We were told the tax cuts would give us a boom of cash to balance the budget, it did not happen that way
9) We were told our troops would be greeted as liberators. They were not
10) We were told Iraqi oil would pay for the war. It is not.
11) We were told Iraq would be a beautiful oasis of democracy, and a model for peace. It is in chaos, civil war, a haven for terrorists and threatening to destabilize the region.
There is a whole lot more, but thats the gist of it.
2007-08-01 06:41:51 · answer #4 · answered by ningis n 1 · 3⤊ 1⤋
there are probably a lot of instances as one forms an opinion or assessment given the information at hand.
i speak of my own experiences where i determined a course of action or made a decision based on the facts at hand only to discover at a later time that the facts changed, or i was misinformed, or lacked critical information or was just plain mislead. do you share the same experiences in your life?
hind site is 20/20 so we have to do the best we can and try not to live with regrets.
2007-08-01 06:40:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Anyone involved in leaking the identity of a covert CIA agent within the administration would be fired.
Rove and Cheany are still there.
2007-08-01 06:33:36 · answer #6 · answered by sprcpt 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Every Pres does that you know why?? No b/c that is why they are the Pres. they cannot tell you everything and still keep everything under control! Stop watching the LIEING news they don't know crap. 1/2 the time actually most the time they contradict their own "facts". Ridiculous!!
2007-08-01 06:41:37 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bush told us he would cut taxes - he cut taxes.
Bush told us he would keep us safe - Since 9/11 no major terror attacks on USA soil
Bush said he would return Honor & Dignity to the White House - DONE
2007-08-01 06:30:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
This is not an occupation but a liberation.
2007-08-01 06:40:44 · answer #9 · answered by gone 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
"We're gonna capture Osama Bin Laden and bring him to justice." -- False.
"Saddam has recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Niger." -- False.
"I don't think anybody anticipated the breach of the levees." -- False.
2007-08-01 06:35:50 · answer #10 · answered by Sangria 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋