If we were to hang bush and blair would it acheive world peace. They caused all the trouble.
2007-08-01 06:00:34 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Probably a long time ago, thanks vinny.
I am glad you Enjoy living in a Police state, It's thicko's like you that have made it all possible.
2007-08-01 07:16:22 · update #1
It was a mock trial. I was a not a fan of saddam, but he was no worse than GWB or TB I have not seen them shed any tears for the many civilians including women and children that have died as a result of mass blanket bombing of civilian areas. Or our own soldeirs that have died in an illegal and unjust war.
The middle east, and the world was a far more peaceful place with him in power than it will ever be in our life, or our children come to that, but then peace was not high up on agenda. Before any of you custards for brains idiots start going on about all the people saddam killed I am not completely sure about this but some **** bombing the **** out of them and their country may not seemed very helpful. Still I'm sure their best interests were at heart. Nothing to do with oil at all. Or did we go to war over WMD's ?
2007-08-01 07:35:05 · update #2
Oh, Ryan don't worry your pretty little head. You just sit yourself down and tune into Fox news.
Satan attorney, and voter.
2007-08-01 07:38:53 · update #3
As for all the Americans on here 'We didn't hang Saddam - The Iraqi's did'.
Bulls.hit!! They are a puppet government controlled by Bush and his cronies...
2007-08-01 06:28:41 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
First of all, the Iraqi people hung Saddam. Second, Bush and Blair only reacted to Saddam and the result was the fall of a dangerous dictator. You are just angry because all of your hero's are being killed.
2007-08-01 06:07:04 · answer #2 · answered by rollmanjmg 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
To be honest, hanging Saddam didn't actually achieve anything. Saddam achieved something, he improved the country, even though he ruled like a dictator, there were people in the country that respected him even though he was strict and at times unfair.
2007-08-01 06:07:10 · answer #3 · answered by kaytii 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The premise of your question is false. "We" didn't hang Saddam. The Iraqi's did. And even if "We" hung him, your use of the term "We" would be incorrect, because you are part of "them". So I think what you meant to spew was "Now that YOU GUYS have hung Saddam"
2007-08-01 06:04:45 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Secret Service and British SAS will be knocking on your door very soon.
2007-08-01 06:04:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
We didn't hang Saddam. The Iraqi government hung him for crimes against Iraqi's.
2007-08-01 06:04:26 · answer #6 · answered by booman17 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No but hanging people like you would lower the dumb question amount by 50% or more.
2007-08-01 06:10:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i swear people are so retarded. it wasnt bush or blair, how about the terrorists who actually ran into the twin towers. i think THOSE are the ones that caused all this. its ok to disagree with the president but wanting to kill him is just hateful.
2007-08-01 06:05:32 · answer #8 · answered by Ryan K 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
The trouble was already there.They have just fouled up in what they thought was the solution. In other words they did not think it through
2007-08-01 06:07:50 · answer #9 · answered by Scouse 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
It would help. Those pair of anti-christs should be treated the same.
vinny: f^ck you and the CIA.
2007-08-01 06:16:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋