Is this indisputable proof that global warming is false?

Question

Right now it is exactly 101 degrees outside yesterday it was 102 degrees!!! Take that liberal doom sayers there is no global warming!!! and I proved it. now go find something else to complain about, (but leave the war alone)

Only an american hatting liebral would think Iwas stupid.

Answer 1

I'm going to assume that you're making a joke, and not trying to actually assert that as a scientific argument.

First, global warming refers to the overall global average temperature, not the specific temperature at any single location. Second, the scientific term is global climate change -- and includes warming at some locations and cooling at others.

Third, even assuming that the majority if any changes are caused by natural solar cycles -- our pollution and burning of fossil fuels has to contribute something to the process, even if it's just a very small amount. So, even if 90% of the problem is natural -- that still means 10% is artificial.

And that 10% might be enough to cause some balance to tip -- especially since we've also destroyed so many of the large forest (millions of square miles of trees) that in past centuries helped things to balance.

So, we're either making the problem worse a little or a lot by our pollution and burning fossil fuels, and we've cut down on the ability of the planet to balance by killing trees. Why is it so difficult for people to accept that MIGHT have an effect?

Answer 2

In 1998 17,000+ scientists signed a petition in Oregon concerning the Kyoto Protocol that states that there is no credible evidence that harmful man induced climate change (global warming) is occurring. Their assertion still stands.

No matter what you have read recently in magazines, newspapers, on the internet, heard on the radio, seen on TV or on the big screen. There is absolutely no credible evidence that can be independently verified that harmful man induced climate change (global warming) is occurring. The same goes for harmful man induced ozone depletion.

The record cold of the decades of the 1940's, 1970's, 1980's and most recently the bitter northern hemisphere winters of 2000-2001, 2001-2002, 2002-2003 argue against the occurrence of harmful man induced climate change (global warming). Also Winter 2000-2001 and 2004-2005 in Siberian Russia, as well as Winter 2004 in Antarctica were the coldest in recorded history. And let's not forget that January 2004 in Boston, MA was the coldest January in 111 years. Grand Forks, ND set its all time record low of -44 deg. below zero F, Fosston, MN also at -50 deg. below zero F and Saskatchewan, Canada saw minimum temperatures fall to -62 deg. below zero F, all in Winter 2003-2004.

But what is the point of the above paragraph? It is to demonstrate that for every short term global record warm weather event that is heralded in the media as an example of global warming, there is a counter balancing global record cold weather event, usually ignored by the media.

To truly measure long term climate change whether it be warmer or colder, takes much more time to accurately measure then the time that we have even possessed the technological means to do so. Natural long term climate change is related to variations in energy output of the Sun and wobbles of our Earth as it spins on its axis, not our puny but arrogant human existence.

NOAA weather and ocean observation data and webcam images from the North Pole showed that in 2002, 2003 and 2004 ice melt began later than normal and the refreeze began earlier than normal. What the heck??? That means that the Summer season was shorter than normal.

Answer 3

the main necessary techniques that the folk can wrestle international warming is getting rid of their older style automobiles (1979 Buick) because of the fact, older automobiles emmitt greater poisonous fumes into the air. Its obtrusive that the greater technological better a automobile is, the fewer volatile gases it emmitts. A automobile that grew to become into geared up 3 or 4 years in the past would be greater economic gadget friendly than a automobile that grew to become into assembled 35 years in the past. for best populated cities mutually with manhattan, Bus and Taxi companys could replace modern automobiles with automobiles that are powered by using hydrogen or electrical energy. in basic terms think of, if each and every considerable city used the Toyota Prius as taxi's, there may be a decreased point of pollutants, and additionally taxi fares must be pretty decrease besides.

Answer 4

A couple of weeks ago, I asked how mankind was responsible for the last ice age. Exactly how many degrees do they think humans raise the planets temperature, anyway? Also, I'm of the opinion that warmer weather is better for growing crops...than say...cooler weather. Isn't it better that the planet warms? Personally, I think the earth heats and cools on it's own cycle, and we really can't do a thing to stop it.

Answer 5

Hehe that's a very Stephen Colbert-like proof. I bet you came up with that in your gut!

The funny thing is, this is one of the most common "proofs" provided by global warming deniers. "It's cold in San Antonio today therefore global warming doesn't exist!". The bulbs are a bit dim in that box.

Answer 6

some of global warming may be false but most of it is true, the sudden raises of temperature here in Canada have be good but really HOT! last year, getting to 30'c would be lucky, 25'c at the most, so i think it may be true.

Answer 7

Global Warming ended the last ice age (10,000 years ago ?)
The Globe has been "warming" since then.
and that's the fact jack !

Answer 8

liberals aren't the ones that complain about global warming...if you hadn't noticed, all of the global warming questions on here are posted by conservatives.

Answer 9

You don't have to prove scientifically that global warming is false. Al Gore (or anyone else) should prove scientifically that's true.

Answer 10

If global warming were false, we wouldn't have back-to-back days of over 100 degrees.

Next time you want to post smack defending an indefensible position, post something that doesn't make you look like (more of) a fool.