2007-08-01 04:29:12 · 21 answers · asked by yutumii 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Bush and Blair and the people behind them have blatantly lied and manipulated, telling people one thing and doing something else, or just doing what they want against the wishes of the public. Aleast Hitler had the decency to be honest about his agenda - to an extent anyway! But they are all as bad as each other - they are all guilty of genocide.
2007-08-01 04:34:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
Hitler to my mind was worse. I think Hitler was as evil as you can get, what cemented my views not that They needed cementing is at the end of the war Hitler knew it was all over for him and the Nazi party, and planning his suicide, he knew the allies were close and there was no way out for him so he made sure he did not suffer needlessly and his dog was despatched with as little pain as possible, but he did nothing to warn his own people. It would have been very easy for him to do so, and he nothing to loose by it. Many people could have escaped. Instead of this they were left to the invading soldiers mercy, not that there was much of that this resulted in mass murder and rape of civilians, and their was in the insuing mayhem you had many rape victim trying to kill themselves. (Berlin Invasion)
It shows what a cruel and heartless man Hitler was even to his own people. I think Blair and Bush are also evil and heartless but not to the same extent. What I think is that any normal person would be unable to cause that amount of suffering that the war in Iraq has caused, it was a needless war that many people have lost their lives in. including civilans and children. All this stuff about us going to war because of Saddam's cruelty to his own people is such a load of crap, I don't think blowing the fcuk out of them made them feel a lot better, Lets face it you did not get GWB and TB rushing in to sierra Leon when all those people including babies were getting their arms and legs chopped off. I don't know why that is, Anybody know if it's an oil rich country?
Rick you be a good boy and do as your told now. Come on time for bed of you go.
2007-08-01 12:09:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well , all three failed
Bush - he thought he could bring peace by wagingg war
Blair - he thought he whould be respected by saying " trust me "
Hitler - well he wanted to take over the world
Out of the three , I can not say who is better . but out of them I would say Hitlar , was at least honest , as he did not try to lie
2007-08-01 19:38:32 · answer #3 · answered by Stephen A 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
None but Hitler and Bush are in a tie between the worst.
2007-08-03 16:33:24 · answer #4 · answered by Sarah* 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Incomparable. HitlEr exterminated around 10M Jews, Gypsies and any other race or creed he did not tolerate. He started a World War in which tens of millions died.
2007-08-02 08:07:15 · answer #5 · answered by nickv2304 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush is the worse, then Hitler, closely followed by B'liar
2007-08-01 13:07:07 · answer #6 · answered by Geez-a-g 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
All three terrible but at least Blair had the decency to step down eventually
2007-08-01 11:34:23 · answer #7 · answered by icam62 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Personally, I like George W.
He is a funny outgoing outdoorsy man.
Just like my late uncle. They even looked the same in profile.
2007-08-01 11:41:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush and Blair have not made it a policy to exterminate any one and you know it
2007-08-01 12:19:07 · answer #9 · answered by Scouse 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Blair...
Although it still bothers me that he made himself one of Bush's lap dogs.
2007-08-01 11:35:58 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋