who r competent to enter into a contract?

Answer 1

In India The Indian Contract Act,1872 clearly provides in section 11 Who are competent to contract
Every person is competent to contract who is of the age of majority according to the law to which he is subject, and who is sound mind and is not disqualified from contracting by any law to which he is subject. Age of Majority is 18 years in India. All person who qualify the above mentioned three conditions are competent to enter into a contract.

Answer 2

According to Indian Contracts Act, a person competent to enter into a lawful contract :-
1. shall not be a'minor'( below 18 years of age);
2.Be of sound mind;
3. Not disqualified by any Act to not to enter into a contract.
4. The contract must be for a lawful object.

Answer 3

Any majors who are sound in health and body,willingly coming to an understanding without coercion,and for totally legal purposes can enter into contract.
You can't enter into a contract to loot a bank or kill some one.Such contracts are not valid under law.
The contract should be under strictly indian laws and enforcible in indian courts.

Answer 4

Any person who are above 18, who are sane and who is perfectly capable of understanding the terms of contract can enter into a contract.

Answer 5

She ought to attempt, yet finding on the settlement and the circumstances, she probably in basic terms isn't helpful. She knew she grew to become into entering right into a settlement whilst she signed, and by using signing she is acknowledging and confirming that she has examine and knows the words of that settlement. There would not look any deceit, undue stress, or an attempt to confuse this lady on the portion of the different occasion in touch. you are able to not cancel the words of the settlement on the only situation of no longer conversing large English. If she grew to become into worried with regard to the language, it grew to become into on her to have it clarified or translated. additionally, till there's a particular fake effect, considered one of those fit in basic terms isn't helpful. you are able to not in basic terms toss the full settlement considering which you at the instant are not from now on satisfied with it or in basic terms go without on the obscure argument of no longer conversing large English. And it is what seems the case. She isn't happy with the arraignment and is finding for some reason to cancel, and he or she will't cancel it subsequently.

Answer 6

Generally just:

18 or over.

No mental illness that impedes decion making.

Answer 7

Anyone who is not a minor, and who is not mentally incapacitated. Mental inability is decided by whether or not one is in an institution, and-or can understand what they are signing.

Answer 8

what are you trying to ask?