i'm thinking of the governing/government of Iraq;
It operates-just about-by a simple majority;nothing wrong
with that.
But if the politicians were selected,fairly,by random-would
these ordinary people be more likely to unify and galvanize
both the government and the population.
(im thinking that the candidates for selection would be Every
Lawful Citizen)
And thus more likely to stop the violence.
Is that a risk worth taking?
2007-08-01
03:53:07
·
2 answers
·
asked by
peter m
6
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy