Her 8 years as first lady does not count.
Honestly, Her only real job was to take care of Bill when he was horney, and she could not even do that right.
2007-08-01 03:40:22 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
So, by that Logic should we also run Laura Bush?
VP = to first lady?
and how does it make me a bigot of all things?
2007-08-01 04:36:36 · update #1
She was an adviser to Bill while they were in the White House.
2007-08-01 03:46:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm voting for Ron Paul. However, I still respect Hillary. She's a very educated and intelligent lady. I would guess that you are a womanizer in your personal life. I highly doubt you are a man capable of thinking beyond your "other" brain.
2007-08-01 13:17:52 · answer #2 · answered by hearts_and_thoughts_2003 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
With her 8 very involved years as First Lady and her 6 years as Senator, she has good experience. At least as good, if not better than George W. Bush when he ran in 2000.
2007-08-01 03:50:42 · answer #3 · answered by brian2412 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Very simple, she lies about it.
She is a phenomenon like her husband, they lie and they even tell you they're lying by being so damned obvious about it. One pump of the fist in the air and the crowd cheers.
There is always going to be a fraction of our society that will admire that ability and reward it. Even I admire it and I think she's satan.
She was in the white house for 8 years?
Let's see, the chef was there for 12, should we elect him?
2007-08-01 03:53:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
She'S not. She is however part of the Bill Clinton political machine that is again trying to grab power. As a country we caN not afford to have a BUSH , CLINTON, BUSH, CLINTON repeat.
2007-08-01 03:46:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
hell you say,Hilary has 8 yeas exp, as she ran the white house during the Clinton administration, bill was to busy trying out interns, to be bothered with running the country, she even managed to kill Vince Foster and get away clean, plus she covered for their real estate scam perfectly and you have the audacity to say she has no exp, shame , shame,
2007-08-01 04:12:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Maybe you have to look at her background to see where her experience lies? She'd make an excellent President - of a crooked trade union or a mafia family.
2007-08-01 03:48:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
And how many years has she been a Senator? Also, why DON'T her 8 years as first lady count? She, more than anyone, knows how the press is going to crucify her no matter what, even if they have to pick on her hairstyles to do it.
2007-08-01 03:43:34 · answer #8 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
ROTFLOL!!!
'Honestly, Her only real job was to take care of Bill when he was horney, and she could not even do that right.'
THAT WAS HARSH!!!!
2007-08-01 03:43:38 · answer #9 · answered by Still Beautifully Conservative 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hillary would just be another boring candidate to you guys if she was a man. *yawn*
2007-08-01 03:44:39 · answer #10 · answered by Le BigMac 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋