English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Can the country trust this person with such a slippery past? She seems a lot more sleazy than all the rest of the democrats.

2007-08-01 03:38:35 · 24 answers · asked by anthony p 3 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

Considering her past sleazy dealings and the fact that she stole from the White House how is she less sleazy than the others?

2007-08-01 04:09:36 · update #1

24 answers

N O!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!You are correct on the last sentence!!

2007-08-01 03:45:07 · answer #1 · answered by Vagabond5879 7 · 1 0

Well you have asked a tough question/questions.

She is not moral, we have seen that over and over with her lies. Ethical, well no, remember the futures trading thing, what she did in the vernacular is unethical.

I know I could not trust her, and honestly about 60% of Americans do not trust her.

She and the Dems are counting on splitting the republican vote ala Perot since that is the only chance she has. They are registering as repubs to vote for Paul in the hopes that after he loses the primary he will run as an independent.

I will have to disagree on the last one, there are many more that are sleazy than her, but she is probably the most hard core Marxist in the party and will take the country in a hard left turn if given the chance.

Want communism in America, vote for hillary.

Want liberty and freedom, vote for a republican, any of them are better than the commies anyday.

2007-08-02 23:11:02 · answer #2 · answered by rmagedon 6 · 1 0

Moral = ethical! To whose standards! yours?
Come now... what do you know about morality or ethics? When do you find an ethical or moral president running this country for the last 15 years? GOP or DEM?

Inequalities in income are sometimes the root cause of immorality.
Discrimination of sexes/gender/races are the root cause of immorality
Discrepancy in education/knowledge/wisdom could cause irresponsibility, negligence, low understanding of issues, thus immorality.
Now get a life and study more about US history. Stop attacking a woman where immoral men predominate the land of ethics. Give her a chance. A sleazy female politician might get the job done and make you awed with your wide open mouth choked up by your own words!

2007-08-01 10:58:22 · answer #3 · answered by voilamonamour 1 · 0 2

She is the type of animal that changes her hide or scales to fit the environment she is currently in. This does NOT instill trust. I could not believe the African-American church in one of the south-eastern states she went and gave a speach to a few months back. I heard part of that speech and she had the unbelieveable gall to try and talk like a black person to the black people. They fell for it. They applauded her. She is a HYPOCRITE. She was making fun of them.

Let's talk about her disrespect to the military while she was first lady. She wanted them to wait on her like servants during a state dinner I believe. She needs to get down on her knees and beg for their forgiveness.

On top of everything else, the only reason she stayed with scum like she is married to, is so she can run for political offices. What kind of message does that send to the young female population. It's okay to tolerate an unfaithful scum bag just to get somewhere in life? I would have respect for her if she had kicked him to the curb years ago, but NO. She hangs onto him like a trophy. How disgusting is that?

So does Hillary have morals or ethics? NO NO NO NO. This country will be begging to have Bush back if Hillary becomes President.

Is there not a woman like Gena Davis who plays Commander in Chief to be our first female President? That is a woman I would vote for. She would easily put those "good ol' boys" of Washington D.C. in their place and bring some real harmony to this country. Not to mention bring back class, honor, morals and ethics to the position of President.

2007-08-09 09:33:31 · answer #4 · answered by Mom of 2 5 · 1 0

Whose the authority on ethics and morals? Nobody's perfect. She's very smart and articulate, and she needs to be to compete in a "man's world". We've never had a woman president so how can you compare sleaze to all those men before her? Maybe her standard of morals and ethics will be the model of the future, seeing that women are more compassionate. Some men tout compassionate conservatism and you know where that has gotten us. Go Hillary!!!

2007-08-08 10:03:41 · answer #5 · answered by Fern O 5 · 0 1

I believe she is smarter than Bill because she hasn't been caught yet. But she is unethical and immoral in her actions and aspirations. She doesn't want to serve the country, she wants her name in history. She believes she deserves whatever she desires just because she desires it. You can't tell me that she doesn't know where every skeleton is buried. Plus there sure are some "timely" deaths of their friends when they were under investigation for Whitewater. She's bad for the country and the world.

2007-08-06 18:56:01 · answer #6 · answered by GRUMPY 4 · 1 0

I don't feel that the powers behind the throne would feel comfortable with someone without a slippery past. This person might develop a backbone and that would be bad for them.

2007-08-08 10:01:21 · answer #7 · answered by ta 5 · 0 1

I think that Denis Kucinik of Ohio is the only decent candidate running. Of course, he has not collected millions from the ignorant masses, so he will not win. Too bad our once great country has come to this.

2007-08-07 15:17:46 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

She is about on par with Bush...

Same agenda, same background, same NWO goals...

But the powers that be, have anointed her our next president.... All we must do is pretend to vote (*so they can change it to their selected winner.)

Its too bad though... There were alot of other good people out there, with good history of servign our country... Ron Paul, Mike Gravel, Bill Richardson... They would of done this country good..

2007-08-05 20:53:07 · answer #9 · answered by Kacy H 5 · 0 1

You have a point.
I don't trust Hillary but I trust her over the current line up of Republicans.

2007-08-07 11:58:32 · answer #10 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 0 1

No, no and no. She is very sleazy..........but there are no democrats running. They're all too far left of "democratic" to be anything but what they are.......... "progressive" socialists.

2007-08-01 11:05:30 · answer #11 · answered by Cherie 6 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers