http://oversight.house.gov/story.asp?ID=1362
2007-08-01 03:37:20 · 14 answers · asked by Becca 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ROIHUNTER: The simple fact that the Presidential Records Act makes it the President's(Bush) responsibility to maintain this information is enough...his name does not have to be mentioned directly in the works. Nixon had his tapes and that was his downfall. And let's not forget that Reagan had his hand in 'shredding documents' by way of Ollie North. I don't for one minute believe that Reagan was left in the blind about any of that. And I don't think that Bush is in the blind regarding the emails through RNC. Do you really believe that the American people are that gulliable and stupid?
2007-08-01 05:19:09 · update #1
There are a number of things that this president, and vice president, should be impeached for. If any other president had done the things that this president has, they would have already been tried and convicted in a court of law. And as much as impeachment proceedings need to be happening they won't. The democrats are to worried about saving face for the 08 elections. It's a sad truth.
Divide and conquer seems to be working. It's working so well, Americans actually hate each other. It's really quite sickening.
A lot of people in this country, not all but a lot, are to loyal to their party and not loyal to their country and the Constitution. So loyal infact, that they become completely blind to what is happening to us as a people.
2007-08-01 03:46:55 · answer #1 · answered by trevor22in 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Firstly, I think you need to take some time and study what grounds can be used to impeach a president. I don't think you would ask this question if you knew. Nowhere in this prelim does it mention Bush.
Secondly, this report will be used for AG fodder more then anything.
2007-08-01 03:51:11 · answer #2 · answered by ROIHUNTER 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Not for that - he should be impeached for not defending our country through pushing amnesty. Jorge Bush is more concerned about the citizens of Mexico!
2007-08-01 05:19:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We the People should be able to do SOMETHING to hold him accountable for these violations. I'm not sure if impeachment is the right answer, but even the president can't be above the law.
2007-08-01 03:42:15 · answer #4 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Yes, he should be, so why aren't the lazy democrats doing something about it. Why do they just talk, and never take any action. The Republicans had no problem doing Clinton, the Democrats are just sheep parading around in sheeps clothing.
2007-08-01 03:49:02 · answer #5 · answered by libsticker 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No. That's not enough by itself. But unfortunately, There's more to impeach him over if you want to try.
2007-08-01 03:46:01 · answer #6 · answered by The Big Box 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm going to say no because I don't see this as a serious enough situation to impeach him over.
2007-08-01 03:40:48 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I totally agree with Trevor22in, I couldn't have said it any better.
2007-08-01 04:24:03 · answer #8 · answered by Follow the money 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bush Derangement Syndrome- two points for me
2007-08-01 03:43:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
NO. Man,that Sen Waxman is freaky looking.
2007-08-01 03:43:14 · answer #10 · answered by Tin Foil Fez 5 · 1⤊ 4⤋