The Great Rev. Al Sharpton thinks that Michael Vick should be considered innocent until proven guilty....?

Question

Where was this belief during the Duke rape scandal?

http://www.foxnews.com/video2/player06.html?073107/073107_oreilly_sharpton&OReilly_Factor&Al%20Sharpton%20on%20Michael%20Vick&acc&US&-1&News&271&&&exp

Answer 1

IT IS TRUE THAT ANYONE IS INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY.

IT IS ALSO TRUE THAT AL SHARPTON IS A DOUCHE

Answer 2

Sharpton also thought Tawana Brawley was raped by bunch of white men. Wonder what he thinks of Vick's buddy copping a plea deal and saying Vick funded the whole thing. Vick may be innocent until proven guilty but that proof is getting awfully damning. Vick better have one heck of a defense for his sake. Those Duke kids were convicted before there was ANY proof. Sharpton obviously is a big believer in the saying "There is no such thing as bad publicity."

Answer 3

Ok, look...it's not about the Reverend Al believing someone is innocent or guilty, it's all about him defending the Black and the Black race, under any circumstance. He feels his purpose here on Earth is to ensure that ANY black, regardless of what they are accused of, gets every bit of that protection that says "a person is innocent until proven guilty"...even when the evidence is insurmountable against their being innocent (dare I mention the O.J. case?).

Our frustration of course is when, in the case of Michael Vick for example, we ALL know what he did and he will be found guilty of animal abuse and other charges...but, the Rev. Al wants us to hold back our conclusions until the Jury has spoken...and it's because Vick is black...pure and simple.

It's not that the Rev. Al is "color blind"...
it's more that he is "color bound".

Answer 4

you will request a tribulation with the aid of jury. You land up waiting a lot longer to get a court docket date. you will probable might desire to show up for a number of preliminary hearinings the place they can help know to in undemanding terms plead accountable. And for on a daily basis extra the court docket expenses upload up. yet at last you will get a wager to inform your area to a jury of your friends particularly than a decide and you a minimum of have a wager to tutor your element. There are some places that deny you this suitable with the aid of defining site visitors offences as civil circumstances particularly than criminal ones. and a few courts will make you pay court docket expenses in spite of the fact that in case you win your case. not each jurisdiction is an identical. yet be very careful in small cities. For a number of them site visitors tickets are the typical city earnings and that they are going to hit you for each dollar you have have been given. The gadget is amazingly corrupt in many places. different places it somewhat is honest and honest. It in basic terms relies upon on the place you're. If there have been federal oversight from the dept of Justice perhaps there may well be much less corruption on the community point.

Answer 5

did you hear the joke about Al Sharpton making a suit against Maytag because they only make white washing machines? Oh, wait - they all have a black agitator!

You really have to question his intentions - I don't think it's about getting equality for the black man - if anything he's counter productive.

Someone should tie a T-bone around the good Reverend's neck and have him visit the poor doggies.

Answer 6

Its obvious Michael Vick is guilty of what he's accused of. Al Sharpton feels it's his duty to stick up for all african americans, no matter the situation. Michael Vick gets what he deserves.

Answer 7

For once, I have to agree with Chester M. Al Sharpton only wants his 15 minutes of fame.

Answer 8

You have a good point. Al Sharpton is a fame seeking quack.

Answer 9

Everyone should be considered innocent until proven otherwise, like when your friends take a lighter sentance and spill the beans.

Answer 10

everyone should be considered innocent until proven guilty whether Mr. Sharpton says it or not.