a GREAT person...
2007-08-01 01:45:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
9⤊
0⤋
Please see what great life!
A little avocate working in South Africa, return to Mother india for save her. It is more then social counssciosnes. Gandhi was the hindu which respect whith judgement vedas and holly puja for gods. That why he undertud that all religion can live togheter and make peace.
Jesus has 12 disscipoles and whithout roman king Constantin,who maked christianity official in Roman empire, maybe Jesus never was known.
Gandhi has a great power.
All hindus have to know that in their souls exist the same knowledge and power!
Bollo Bollo Gandhi Ji ki.Jay
DEAR INDIANS, DON'T LET THE POLITIC AND SUBLIMINAL MANIPULATION OF SOME INTERES GROUPS TO DESTROY YOUR SYMBOLS.
JUST YOU CAN STOP THE WEST TO DESTROY INDIAN SYMBOLS.
KEEP THE GANDHI GOOD EVEN YOU ARE NOT SHROORE OF THAT, BECAUSE INDIA NEED IT.
DON'T BELIVE ALL FALSE STORRYIES BECAUSE YOU KNOW ; GANDHI WAS JUST A GREAT PERSON...NOTHING EVIL.
Of chourse that he talked whith more evil persons because he saccrifed himself for liberate India, and that kine of peoples was politic liders than. So Gandhi couldn't evitate to meet them.
2007-08-03 07:12:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The blunders made by Gandhi are enormous, the present day India is feeling the impact. Ofcourse, he did some good things like self reliance by making everyone wear kadhi (but today even his grandson now is not wearing Kadhi).
Overall, to me he is not a great person as what history has projected.
2007-08-03 00:25:39
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lavgan 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He was a big failure .......He was a selfish and a stubborn man........... He never supported any one else like those of Bhagat Singh and even asked the while country which was following him with their eyes closed........not to support Subhash Chandra Bose who one of the true freedom fighter.......................... Its a misconception of many that the freedom was won only because of gandhi where as it wasn't because of him...............more over if gandhi truly wanted partition could be stopped..............I know this that gandhi never wanted his country divided.............this i am saying because when the riots started he went to so called "maun vratt" (he stopped speaking and eating) which led to a chain reaction leading to the partition........................ was the biggest mistake he did leading to his assassin................... Nathuram was a respectable man and the reason he did so was also a long story......... I never respected gandhi and his theory is for the weak....................this is why India is today a communally weak country..
<<<<<<< I HATE HIM>>>>
2007-08-01 10:35:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
He was indeed a great Indian. He achieved greatness over the heads of greater contemperories like Netaji , Abul Kalam Azad and I would say even Jinnah.
2007-08-01 09:01:40
·
answer #5
·
answered by brij_26pal 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Certianly Gandhi is one of the great personality of modern age?His experiments with truth(Satyagragha),Nonviolence (Ahimsa) has shaken the mighty British empire without having the bloodbath seen in other countries in their fight towards freedom.
It is a fact his ideals are difficult to follow but
that cannot be reason for having a compromised ideal.
The intrinsic value of his message has relevance for Generation next too as seen from the success of Munnabhai.The sorrow felt by common man for Sanjay Dutt,on his jail senctence for a proven crime and who was having a bad guy image prior to Munnabhai series talks volume for relevance of his ideology.
The blame for partition of india is to blamed by all concerned and not by Gandhi alone.Even accepting his failure to stop partition in the aftermath of bloodbath in various parts of India and a grim future outlook , created by long communal propoganda by communal forces and insensivity shown by Congress leaders in their attempt to grab power,ignoring Muslim League, which by now had become somewhat representative of Muslim community as in UP.The ageing ledership of political parties were in a haste to capture power without waiting any further or sharing it with others.
His ideology is nontheless relevant for existence of mankind in the face of environmental degradation caused by unhindered consumerism realised by Gandhi alone and spread of viloence both of state and nonstate one.
2007-08-01 09:22:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by genu 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
well personally i dont like gandhi
i believe that he was a real good orator and a greater leader of the countary but those gandhiian policies are of no use
today is the age of agression. non violence doesnt stand a chance in international affairs.
cheers
2007-08-01 09:24:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by abhinavjoshi_123 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Any one who Love Humanity will love respect and worship,Mahatma Gandhi Ji ,he is equivalent to Jesus and Buddha, and for me even greater then them, as people can find short coming in Jesus and Buddha, some Moron stupid idiot who does not have any love and respect for there parents can find failure in Gandhi Ji, Jesus and Buddha, by the way I can bet that people who try to find shortcoming in Gandhi Ji also feel disgrace when they see there mother father and children.
2007-08-01 14:49:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by ritustudio1 1
·
0⤊
2⤋
I am, unfortunately, not as informed on his entire life as I should be but by all accounts he was a peaceful "protester" who was instrumental in steering change for the better during his life. I would say that is a good thing.
2007-08-01 08:45:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Brian 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
mahatma Gandhiji was hahimsa he did not like partition of indian & pakistan saparate countries he like one india, but jinna was demand saparate pakistan and nehru sardhar valla bhai patel also demand to saparate so india became saparete and also pakistan in this matter gandhiji heart broken he told i am not involve this politics.that was mahathama was great till today in the world
2007-08-01 09:30:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by bhavani g 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
First I don't THING.Secondly,you GRATE on my nerves by using this word for one of the GREATEST persons ever , be it any century.
2007-08-03 21:12:37
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋