Has anyone noticed people around the time when The Jetsons came out thought the "future" looked different than the futuristic shows that came later. Like The Jetson's view of the future was more like retro future, but Star Trek future is more metal and shiny and not ugly blue floating TVs with sticking out antennas. Has anyone noticed?
2007-07-31 18:33:00 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
I prefer the 30s version of the future, where everything looked art deco
2007-07-31 18:40:52 · answer #1 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends on who was trying to create the future. It was more of, "I'm going to make the future look like this." I suppose it was a difference of opinion. Plus, William Shatner is a little weird. Oh, but Star Trek did have the blue tooth thing down, how the communicated without phones, but with a tiny electronic piece in their ear, kinda cool if you ask me.
2007-07-31 18:40:46 · answer #2 · answered by elias 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I liked the Jetsons version of the future.
2007-07-31 18:36:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, but are you comparing what you think the future will look like after watching the Jetsons and Star trek, welcome to the real world my friend. Time to wake up
2007-07-31 18:36:40 · answer #4 · answered by flannelpajamas1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
impressions and expectations of the future are always changing.
The future ain't what it used to be.
2007-07-31 18:40:36 · answer #5 · answered by kent_shakespear 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Duh...who cares!!! I don't watch cartoons.
2007-07-31 18:35:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋