...considering how many scandals and f#ck-ups have come from this administration? What reason do we have to believe that he is not up to something sinister, and hiding behind the veil of "SECURITY"? Isn't that how HITLER was able to do what he did? Under the guise of "SECURITY"?
2007-07-31 17:57:06 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I am not a "leftie"...just that you assume so makes me think you are either naive, or kept in the dark. At least HALF of conservatives don't like Bush, and most of them are ready to end this pointless war. We are creating more terrorists being there than we are killing.
2007-07-31 19:53:54 · update #1
It is a good thing the Clinton Presidency want mired with cover ups by Bill and Hillary.
2007-07-31 18:02:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Actually, if you look at the details of all the so called scandals you find a lot of accusation and very little real evidence. As far as secrecy goes, the current administration is far less secretive than just about any in time of war. Compare it to FDR's', JFK's' or Johnson's'.
The difference today is that politicians will use the most flimsy allegations, or in many cases deliberately false accusations to score political points.
When this is combined with the almost exclusive control of the press by politically motivated journalists, who insure that any facts which contradict the party-line are suppressed, it allows a completely false impression to be spoon fed to all the people too lazy to check the facts.
I don't TRUST the current administration or any other. That's why I constantly check facts. Experience has taught me over the years that the press is the first in line to do a cover-up of Democrat misdeeds, at least until they can't anymore, then they do the briefest, most favorable coverage they can and get it buried as fast as they can.
Conversely, they will endlessly repeat allegations directed at Republicans, even after said allegations have been disproven.
While I don't trust the Bush administration, I've found too many instances of outright lying by the media that I trust the news media even less.
As long as the reporters at ABC, CBS, NBC, the NYT, etc. keep doing stories that on further investigation prove to be so false that the lies had to be deliberate, I'll take anything negative about the current administration as false until I can prove otherwise on my own.
2007-07-31 18:31:37 · answer #2 · answered by Mark S 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Isn't comparing President Bush with Hitler a little extreme? I have no problem with opposing him, or not liking the way he leads the country, but he has never really come close to proposing a "Final Solution".
This will back up my position.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvpr7MpAkjU
2007-07-31 18:12:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
we could desire to constantly ask them the comparable situation they ask us approximately all the cord tapping non-experience.... "in case you have have been given no longer something to cover then what are you worrying approximately?" If all people could desire to have loose get right of entry to to counsel it is going to be the persons. all people who desires to regulate the flow of counsel desires to regulate the international. The consolidation of media on each and every point (T.V. , information superhighway, Radio, etc.) is starting to be very risky. the phantasm of separation will stay yet interior the tip it is going to in all risk be owned by using ONE company (yet of direction that company could be owned by using the government). Bush isn't the undertaking. think of of it as a activities team. each and every so often while the gamers start to do poorly the instructor is blamed.....of direction...in case you inquire from me...i do no longer think of Bush is the instructor of something he's in basic terms pretending. climate or no longer there is a few "darkish parent" lurking interior the historic past who's unseen and desires for dying and destruction for all could desire to nonetheless be up for debate.....this is been suggested already that a "shadow" government exists. So what rather desires to be found out is "who's calling the pictures?" The final question we could desire to constantly ask ourselves is this. How do we get to them and punish them for there treachery?
2016-12-11 06:44:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wasn't that how Stalin came into power too? F**king retard, Check out what happened between him and Trotsky! Alot of fear monguring there too. But then again people only use history when they want to huh? I trust Bush because, under him, we've only had one, ONE major terrorist attack against America or Americans anywhere. How many under Clinton? Yea, google that s**t, gotta love history.
2007-07-31 18:09:04 · answer #5 · answered by m 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually, I'm quite comfortable with Bush and his secrets.
Can't you lefties come up with anything more original than comparing Bush to Hitler? I mean they are worlds apart.
You're not a lefty? Sure sound like one to me.
2007-07-31 18:11:23 · answer #6 · answered by Uncle Pennybags 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Hmm, let's see. No families complaining about mass arrests, no death camps or ghettos, no seizures of all assets of Muslim's in this coutry, we're fighting enemies who actually attacked us numerous times instead of just placing blame on them for our problems.
I really don't see how Hitler and Bush are comparable, and I don't socialize with terrorists so I'm not scared. So, yeah. its cool.
2007-07-31 18:05:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I don't trust the Bush administration, but until the next election comes around there isn't much anyone can do about it. Maybe we'll get lucky and he'll be impeached.
2007-07-31 18:01:44 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
How many times are you going to post the same question?\
2007-07-31 18:02:09 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋