2007-07-31 17:38:02 · 22 answers · asked by Swedish Meatball 87 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Not at all! because I am not voting for any Liberal or Democrat.
2007-07-31 17:40:40 · answer #1 · answered by Samm 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
No, I would not vote for Mr. Clinton either. I did read his book however, and I love the friendship has developed for Senior Bush. They are sincerely friends.
2007-08-03 20:38:57 · answer #2 · answered by Ms Blue 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the novelty of her being a woman and former first lady is what has her ahead today. I think if she was a man there would be little to no interest of her. I believe that by the time the elections come around the people will notice she has the best campaign manger (her husband) and she is just bland mush.
2007-08-01 00:52:12 · answer #3 · answered by eric l 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Whether Hillary is a man or a woman makes no real difference to me. I will not vote for her. This woman cannot tell a consistent story and changes her message constantly to make herself seem more appealing to whatever group she is talking to at the time. In short Hillary is just another untrustworthy, power hungry politician. Electing her would be the worst possible course for the country and would ensure another four years of a nastily divided electorate. If she was running unopposed I would write in Mickey Mouse.
2007-08-01 00:48:42 · answer #4 · answered by Bryan 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Not sure what the point in this type of speculation is. She's never going to be male. I am of the party, but have no current plans to vote for her anyway, despite my favoritism toward her husband.
2007-08-01 00:42:27 · answer #5 · answered by Joe D 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. And if America rejects her in '08, you know the headlines will be "America wasn't ready to accept a woman as president" rather than "America just didn't like Hillary"
2007-08-01 00:52:02 · answer #6 · answered by nileslad 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely............. NOT. I don't trust her. I can see deception and hardness in her eyes. I hear it behind her words. Male or female has nothing to do with ability to run a nation. It's charachter, and integrity.
2007-08-04 18:07:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If she were male, she wouldn't have been the First Lady (her only real claim to fame) but probably would have ended up a rich corporate lawyer
2007-08-01 00:50:14 · answer #8 · answered by Paladin 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
No because another Clinton would just disgrace the office. See also has no concept of a budget.
2007-08-01 00:45:13 · answer #9 · answered by No More Mr. Nice Guy 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
No, I'm not ready to see another Clinton in office. Besides, that doesn't mean he/she still wouldn't have such socialist views.
2007-08-01 00:41:14 · answer #10 · answered by Glen B 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I wouldn't like H Clinton no matter what sex she was.
2007-08-01 00:53:46 · answer #11 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋