2007-07-31 17:15:34 · 9 answers · asked by AtThePub 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Richard Harris, obviously. Theres just something about him that makes him the better dumbledore. he seems more like the character; calm, secretive, smart. also, as bluedragon1492 says, richard harris had the twinkle in his eye, just like dumbledore is supposed to. it sucks that he passed away, he was such a better actor to portray dumbledore.
2007-08-02 06:17:53 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Richard Harris looked much more like the Dumbledore I imagined, but Micheal Gambon was a good replacement for him.
2007-08-01 00:19:15 · answer #2 · answered by këlly 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Richard Harris. Michael Gambon plays such a horrible Dumbledore. He makes him seem sooo much angrier and mean. He just doesn't have that Dumbledore quality we all know and love...
2007-08-01 00:23:25 · answer #3 · answered by Dani Marie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Richard Harris was born to play Dumbledore. He was strikingly similar to the character in the book. Gambon is a third-rate ripoff who took advantage of a legend's death and acted his role.
2007-08-01 00:20:35 · answer #4 · answered by AwAkEnEdBaNkAI 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
micheal gambon sucks : ) richard harris was exactly how i pictured him!!
2007-08-01 00:18:21 · answer #5 · answered by Tinkerbell eats Yahoo! 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Christopher Walken.
2007-08-01 00:18:31 · answer #6 · answered by ny21tb 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
richard harris. but ian mckellan would've been amazing as dumbledore from the first movie.
2007-08-01 00:18:20 · answer #7 · answered by ¾ pErFeCt™ 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
definitely the original. he had a twinkle in his eye that the new one just doesn't have.
2007-08-01 00:18:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
at first, i did not like michael...but he has grown on me!
i like both.
besides, what can you do about?
2007-08-02 01:38:36 · answer #9 · answered by Mustardseed 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋