...will it lose all of the credibility it established over the years and go the route of Fox News, Sky News, and the New York Post?
2007-07-31 15:37:37 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
As long as it doesn't resemble the NY Times it will be fine.
2007-07-31 15:41:02 · answer #1 · answered by Brian 7 · 3⤊ 8⤋
It will turn into toilet paper, like every other newspaper he runs. There are few reliable sources of objective journalism done on an international scale left. Most papers in the US are limited to covering only local news. With the loss of the WSJ there are only two large scale newspapers left in this country, the New York Times and The Washington Post. My guess is that they are not long for this world either.
2007-07-31 15:45:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good question so it will probably be deleted I have a really bad feeling about the guy I will go along with the posters who say he wants to replace the USA with Australia as the leading country in the world That is pretty insane considering our military might but rupert is an egomaniac
2016-05-19 03:14:05 · answer #3 · answered by beth 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it Rupert Murdock didn't get to be one of the richest men in the world by making stupid mistakes. He didn't purchase it so he cud change it, but because it's making money and now will make him money. I'm sure he subscribes to the adage "if it's not broke don't fix it" so I don't expect any changes in the journal. I have no idea where ur comming from about fox news and the ny post as they are at the top of their game.
2007-07-31 15:48:22 · answer #4 · answered by typea911 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You do know Rupert Murdock is a liberal right? he contributes heavily to the Clinton campaigns. He is also a businessman who is trying to make a buck. The WSJ is a successful paper that is making money, Murdock will not mess with that. In fact Fox news is only there because there was a gap in the market he recognized and tried to fill it and did very well with his choice.
2007-07-31 15:42:40 · answer #5 · answered by JFra472449 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋
Yep, it's gonna suck now.
Rupert Murdock reminds me of Mr. Potter in It's a Wonderful Life" only he wants to control the world.
2007-07-31 15:42:09 · answer #6 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Does anyone know how to spell Rupert Murdoch's name? I just wish there were some sot of quick, electronic medium I could use in order to find out!!! It's so confusing!!!
Next question.
2007-07-31 15:44:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
it'll go the fox news, george bush route
many americans believing his garbage he puts on the air, i shudder at the thought
2007-07-31 17:47:45 · answer #8 · answered by knhglassey@sbcglobal.net 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The WSJ lost all credibility years ago, during the Clinton witch hunt.
2007-07-31 15:40:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
It may not change but it will be perceived as less credible.
2007-07-31 16:16:17 · answer #10 · answered by ash 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Those organizations have not lost credibility, or they wouldn't be as widely viewed as they are. Apparently, a lot of people still think that they are credible.
I don't think you'll see a lot of change in the format or content of the Journal.
2007-07-31 15:41:22 · answer #11 · answered by Bryan F 3 · 2⤊ 5⤋