Your arguments get even cheaper.
By cheap, I mean that you continue to confuse my statements as commentary on whether you should protest President Bush or not rather than commentary on the quality of your protest.
I'm waiting for your posts to degenerate into stomping feet and throwing things. Or is that TOO far for you?
Is insulting the intelligence of two of our representatives your limit? No issues, no discussion of things you consider stupid, just straight to, "They're dumb".
The same thing was done to President Clinton. It was contemptible then, it's contemptible now. Why would I have different standards for how we treat our representatives?
It seems like anyone younger than thirty has totally confused sedition with patriotic protest.
This is her idea of what I'm saying, straight to insults, assumptions about people she hasn't met that disagree with her, sarcasm? Where's the intelligent dialog? Is this what you side with? This kind of "reasoning"?
You mean it is impossible to discuss the issues without degenerating into a name-calling session for you? And then you actually forget to bring in some facts? Goodness, like there's a lack of facts behind this? What does that say about your own intelligence, dear? Before you insult others, consider what you are saying about yourself.
Is this the "high double digit" IQ we're talking about?:
From: Roxann Colter
Subject: Gee
Message: Thanks for taking me to task.
I've reprogrammed my mind based on your suggestions and now I find that our president and vice president were right to lead us into a war based on lies and I'm sure the thousands of innocent US and Iraqis killed in the process aren't mourned too much by their loved ones because after all, Mr. Bush and Mr. Cheney are to be respected at all costs because they are our President and Vice President.
Geeeeeze. Give me a break and while you are at it wake up and inhale the coffee deeply. You need it.
Also, take a break from YA for a few days and experience a bit of the real world that occurs outside your little computer room. Just a suggestion. "
2007-07-31 21:09:19
·
answer #1
·
answered by mckenziecalhoun 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
#1. bush graduated yale university...
A. Although bush has admitted to not being a good student, he still graduated with an average score from an ivy league school.
#2. Gonzales graduated harvard law school with a j.d. degree-
A. Harvard law school is probably the most prominent law school in the world... and an ivy league school
B. A Juris Doctor degree requires a person to score in the top 10% of the LSAT
those people are dumb? that is the stupidest thing ive ever read.
i bet youre going to say bush isnt a successful president either...?
2007-07-31 15:52:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Better Question: IQ, Which is higher
1. Alberto Gonzolaz + George Bush, Add their IQ and triple the result
2. Dog
2007-07-31 15:34:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Bush and Gonzales are old friends. Bush does not strike me as a guy who wants people in the room who are more intelligent than he is unless they are giving him his instructions, read the people who let him/brought him into the club, Daddy, Rummie, Cheney, Kissinger, Baker, David Rockefeller...the people who have been in the club forever.
The club?...George Carlin knows
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dY4WlxO6i0
2007-07-31 15:54:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Perry L 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
A negative plus a negative is still a negative. Now if they were to multiply that would be a positive but then their party would disown them.
Perhaps if it were measured in the terms of mass we would get something like this?
2.17645 × 10−8 kg
2007-07-31 16:29:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Atrum Animus AM 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Bush replaced into not an excellent speaker yet he replaced into somewhat smart. a lot greater so than human beings provide him credit for. He under no circumstances bragged approximately his achievements yet favorite to allow human beings to underestimate him. At a minimum i'm hoping you will attempt your man or woman assumptions and questioning approximately our former President. I furnish some questions to help that technique. •Upon what do you base your view of President Bush’s mind? How a lot is it formed with the aid of the typical information approximately him? How a lot with the aid of verbal miscues highlighted with the aid of the clicking? •Do you low value your estimate of his mind because of the fact he’s from Texas or because of the fact of his accessory? because of the fact he’s an athlete and a ranch proprietor? because of the fact he under no circumstances advertises that he went to Yale and Harvard? •this may well be a demanding one, for liberals in undemanding terms. Do you anticipate that he's unintelligent because of the fact he made coverage possibilities with which you disagree? if so, your logic may well be backwards. “I disagree with determination X that President Bush made. No smart man or woman might desire to end X, consequently President Bush is unintelligent.” might or not it somewhat is plausible that an smart, considerate conservative with distinctive values and priorities than your man or woman might have reached a distinctive end than you? Do you somewhat think of your coverage perspectives derive in undemanding terms out of your mind? and finally, in case you base your view of President Bush’s mind on a public image and comedian strip formed with the aid of previous due evening comedians, op-ed writers, television pundits, and Twitter, is that a smart element so you might do?
2016-10-13 07:25:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That sounds about right. Combined 80-90 range.
2007-07-31 15:45:59
·
answer #7
·
answered by Follow the money 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
i think Alberto Gonzalez IQ is higher that just prove how smart Bush is. people that say Bush is an idiot is just not seeing the same president i see talking the guy is just retarded and extremely funny the his not even trying and his retarded imagine if he was trying.
2007-07-31 15:50:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by clyde 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes. Congratulations! You are very observant. After all, you and only you have noticed that both are, by your assertions, severely to profoundly mentally retarded, and unable to handle even the most basic of daily functions, such as clothing and feeding themselves.
Yawn. Next question.
2007-07-31 15:37:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Boy, this is hard. Neither one of them are very articulate. Both are pretty smug and condescending. Are we sure they aren't the same person?
Great question !
2007-07-31 16:28:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jackie Oh! 7
·
3⤊
0⤋