Do you think Jesse or Al *should* or (will) stick up for Michael Vick regarding his dogfighting court case? Ironically, I have heard a peep from either. I think Vick is innocent until proven guilty, so I am not saying anything either, but Jackson defended the stripper without reservation, so I would think that he would be sticking up for Vick. What do you think?
2007-07-31 15:09:16 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Football (American)
I wouldn't want either of the two to stand up for me, cause half of the time they turn the focus on themselves...however, i think that was a great, but funny as hell question...where are they..they should have been in the spotlight by now!!! LMAO :)Sorry for Vick, but when one guy talks, the rest go down. That's what the conspiracy is all about..he will be done!!!
2007-07-31 15:16:15 · answer #1 · answered by Who Dat Chic!! 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Man i was wondering about that's two clown Rev. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Boy went they show up their favorite word is Boycott and always seem to stick into peoples business too much. Just like the Dukes La Cross players got charge with the rape crime, those two show up and started talking like those Dukes players were guilty already, but at the end, they were found innocent off all the charges. And those two never apologies to the Dukes players, but they did talk in public at a conference like those Dukes players were guilty already. I guess this times, those two don't show up and makes a case for Mike Vick because the evident is overwhelmingly guilty as charges. But they did go behind the seen and try to tell TV news lets not rush to judgment, lets the court takes it course. But we all know the evident is too strong and Vick got a friend that's already is ratting him out LOL.
2007-07-31 21:09:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree that they see Michael Vick as a sinking deliver and are doing the final they are able to to ward off him. yet I additionally think of that it would be a large danger for them to make an occasion of him as a sort of ignorant cases that cancels out each and every step made forward by using dragging anybody 2 steps back. Sharpton and Jackson are civil rights activists and it is an animal rights situation. And by the form, Michael Vick isn't being discriminated against. He did of course dedicate a criminal however. persons from all races work together in animal scuffling with.
2016-10-08 22:51:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sharpton was on the O'Reilly Factor today defending, not Vick per se, but rather his right to have public judgment suspended until the case has been heard. True, he is innocent until proven guilty, but man does it look bad!
2007-07-31 15:57:56 · answer #4 · answered by space boy 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The OJ network is certainly at it again. I advocate prison for anyone torturing dogs for fun and profit. But if Nicole Simpson's life was worthless because of OJ's skin, then what are a bunch of muts? At least he didnt drive on a suspended license.
2007-07-31 15:17:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm very surprised they haven't. Usually they will support any as*hole, as long as he is black.
2007-07-31 15:18:51 · answer #6 · answered by stan l 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure two reasons. He's black and famous.
2007-07-31 15:12:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
everybody is sick of all these retards in the news...........
2007-07-31 15:17:34 · answer #8 · answered by john doe 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋