By presenting to me, does the purity of what is corrigible maintain itself?
2007-07-31 14:52:32 · 3 answers · asked by Baron VonHiggins 7 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
J.W.H., I see purity in your gainsaying. Excelsior.
2007-07-31 15:22:21 · update #1
...similarity in the declarative response, "There is no such thing as soul," when a question is posed about the soul. Noumenon does not leave the mark, it provides for our being marked. Ergo, the fundamental difference between J.W.H.'s "TO" and my "OF". It presents an intelligibility OF itself TO me INFORMALLY, as opposed to the rigid and formal defining mode, where there is infinite opportunity for contrast.
2007-08-01 00:35:15 · update #2
Hi Vonhiggins,
"The Inner Spirit" of people loves "purity".. but, the mind of people is often rebellious....The mind of people loves "stillness"... but, the desires of people draw them into activity.....
When a person is constantly able to govern their desires, their "mind" becomes spontaneously still... When the mind is spontaneously still....their minds have not been cleansed, and their "desires" have not been sent away....
>>>>>>>
When the mind is pure... Then, with certainty the desires will cease to come forward, and the poisons will be eliminated and dissolved....
>>>>>>
The reason people do not possess the ability to achieve this, is : because their minds are not clear ...and their desires are unrestrained....
>>>>>
The spirit of humans, loves purity, but the mind disturbs it.... The mind of humans loves stillness, but the desires.... draw it away..... :-)
>>>>>>>>
Thanks, for the question! :)
My regards!
2007-08-01 05:58:07 · answer #1 · answered by Kimberly 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Corrigible means being repairable or can be set straight or corrected. There is no purity to what is corrigible. There is only a state or level of being corrigible. Anything that is not corrigible is incorrigible. It either is or is not. Nothing can be presented to you that could possibly maintain itself if it is not pure.
2007-07-31 22:12:31 · answer #2 · answered by J. W. H 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
why do philosophers use to many big words?
2007-07-31 21:55:03 · answer #3 · answered by jacobdylan2003 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋