Giuliani is the front runner. Does character still matter to Republicans?
2007-07-31 13:47:23 · 8 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
koalatcomics (below) Do you ever answer questions or simply cut-and-paste rants?
2007-07-31 13:53:00 · update #1
Magyar (below) Can you say "cop out"? So now, according to you, Republicans base their morals on liberal's standards which have never sunk as low as putting a Giuliani in front of the pack.
2007-07-31 14:02:26 · update #2
Who says that neo-cons are supporting Giuliani? Neo-cons are not interested in matters of morality, only in gaining power and using it to improve our country. You can think of them as Machiavellians. Character matters to most Repubs, which is why Rudy G. will not get the nomination. I predict Fred Thompson or Newt Gingrich will be the Repub candidate. Rudy is too liberal on the social issues and he has the indecency problems that you mentioned.
IF you are asserting that all Repubs are neo-cons, that is obviously not correct. They are a small minority of the Republican party. Neo-cons have more in common with liberals than with most Republicans.
2007-07-31 14:01:54 · answer #1 · answered by Shane 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Republicans are simply holier-than-thou moralizing monumental hypocrites but their filthy hypocricies and lies seem to have been accepted by many.
Senator Vitters is just the Poster Adulterer Hypocrite for the entire Republican movements "family values" crap.
In so many areas Democrats/liberals have let the republicans get away with ruling the moral/ethical agenda and this must stop .
Never hesitate to call any and all Republicans (especially the incredibly anti-Christian Christian Fundamentalists ) on all their hypocritical garbage and do not LET THEM USE GOD and MY CHRIST to hide behind their stinking hypocricy.
Anyone who would re-elect a war mongering President that chose to wage an illegal war based upon a pack of sooooo anti-Christian lies that has led to the slaughter of over 400,000 innocent Iraqi civilians is simply MORALLY BANKRUPT and that is exactly what a majority of Americans (obviously mostly Republicans ) did.
These are simply MORAL LEPERS.
2007-07-31 21:01:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
For crying out loud, none of us can sit in that kind of judgement against another person...secondly, the heart will love who it's going to love. I would rather have someone happy than in a miserable relationship. What the hell is wrong with you to think YOU have any right to judge another human being??????? Morals do matter to Republicans and I would rather have a person come out in public than go sneaking around illicitly!
2007-07-31 21:12:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hypocrisy! Newt Gingrich was having an affair all the time he was trying to hang Clinton for having an affair. Mark Foley sexually harrassed the male pages. It goes on and on. They talk the talk, but don't walk the walk.
2007-07-31 20:54:04 · answer #4 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Does character matter to the Dems -
Clinton "I did not have sex with that woman"
2007-07-31 20:52:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
as compared to the clintons...
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
i think rudy has a bit less issue. rudy saved nyc...clintons fame
uss cole
no response
african embassy bombings
no response
first wtc
no response
at least six separate chances to capture or kill bin laden in sudan...
no reponse
sorry liberal you lose on this one...its an apples and oranges comparison. in clintons case the fruit is rotten.
2007-07-31 20:51:17 · answer #6 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Guiliani is worse than Bush...more self righteous..
2007-07-31 20:52:58 · answer #7 · answered by bushcrimeboss 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Why do you care?
2007-07-31 20:54:29 · answer #8 · answered by The prophet of DOOM 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋