English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

was responsible for the 9/11 attacks. Do you agree with me that if Al Gore HAD WON THE ELECTION as well as the popular vote the September 2001 attacks would not have taken place? Do you think that this election was stolen in order for these attacks to take place and to put the world on its perilous course?

2007-07-31 13:10:00 · 20 answers · asked by themoreitcoststhebetteritis 3 in Politics & Government Elections

20 answers

I agree with you -though hindsight is 20-20.
The reason they wouldn't have happened is because of Gore's attention to detail and the fact that he would have been well aware of what was going on with Al-Quada and Osama Bin Lama. In Bush's arrogance and stupidity he didn't have the smarts to realize that the intelligence that was coming across his desk needed immediate action and attention.

2007-07-31 13:39:06 · answer #1 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 1 6

Unfortunately this is how our elections are run, by electoral vote of each state. No, I don't believe that the 2000 election was stolen so that these attacks could take place! We have no way of knowing whether Gore would have acted any differently than the Bush administration did, no one could believe that this was really going to happen & no one had any idea of where the planes were to be boarded by the terrorist, so we had no way of stopping them short of stopping all flights & even then the planes would have been exploded along with the airports with, perhaps, even greater loss of life. I am no fan of this administration but I don't believe they, or anyone in our government had anything to do with these attacks.

2007-07-31 20:23:40 · answer #2 · answered by geegee 6 · 1 0

You are right to think that Al Gore won the 2000 election. He did, in fact, receive more popular votes than George W. Bush. However, Bush received more electoral votes, which due to the Florida recount "situation" gave him the final authority he needed to win, by a margin of 537 votes.

As per the second part of your question, had i not had that extra piece of pumpkin roll with lunch today, my tooth would not be hurting from an inevitable sugar overload. But, perhaps it wasn't the pumpkin roll. Perhaps it was building up due to the the other sweets i've been consuming. The point is, I will never know what caused my toothache, nor will I dwell on it. I'll just do whatever I can to fix it as quickly as possible before more harm is done.

That's how you should view 9/11, Iraq and the entire Bush administration.

2007-07-31 20:25:01 · answer #3 · answered by Sandy 2 · 0 3

I dont know how you can possibly believe that. Al Gore didnt win a single vote count. Not even the ones done by the media after the results were in using incredibly liberal standards on what a vote is.

9/11 would have happened regardless. The only difference is we would have been hit more.

2007-07-31 21:39:05 · answer #4 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 3 0

You could not be more wrong. If the terrorists candidates had won, we would have experienced another 911, proably worse. Why? Terrorists know liberals are cowards and will never, ever defend the USA- never militarily.

I live in FL & saw first hand how libs tried to steal the election; they played the race card, threw out the military votes; did you know Clinton moved the polls off-base to deter as many votes as possible (knowing the military reviles liberals, socialists and cowards). A liberal invented the idea that Bush was responsible for 911, only a true USA hater would ever think that was true.

Maybe you should join the terrorists? You have a lot in common; oh, one thing you don't, they are not cowards.

2007-07-31 20:53:34 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 2 0

If you are still thinking about Al Gore winning, then all that proves to me is that you are 6.9 yrs out of touch with reality.

If you are still promoting your Al Quaida fed theory about 9/11 and attempting to blame the current Admin, you are clearly on the Os. Bin Laden payroll, delusional and the sand fleas have crawled in your ears so far they are coming out the other side.

The election was stolen? so the attacks could take place? to put the world on its perilous course? OMG OMG OMG, you are SO smart!

2007-07-31 22:12:36 · answer #6 · answered by Noone i 6 · 1 0

Did you move to France like you promised if Bush won a second term? Gore lost fair and square. The nutcase Muslims were responsible for 9-11. Get over it.

2007-08-01 13:01:42 · answer #7 · answered by John himself 6 · 1 0

Get over it already. Al Gore didn't win--no matter how many recounts were done.
And 9/11 was perpetrated by Islamic fascists, not our own government.

2007-08-01 00:17:41 · answer #8 · answered by Merissa F 3 · 2 0

I still believe that the 2000 elections were rigged; Florida elections run into last minute toll problems....Jeb Bush = Governor of Florida....very obvious.

However I used to believe that the Bush admin. were responsible for the 9/11 attacks, but if you actually think about it, when was the last time the United States government managed to keep a secret from everyone? Especially this administration....things leak, but I doubt they intentionally let 9/11 happen. They may have ignored the news of an incoming threat, but I do believe the Bush administration did not foresee it, but did CAPITALIZE on it.

2007-07-31 20:18:11 · answer #9 · answered by khanomtom83 3 · 4 4

I think Al Gore won the 2000 election. No, we would not have gone to war with Iraq, and I can't see any rational reason why the "failure" to attack would cause any threat to our security, whatsoever.

However, I tend to agree with Kahnontom, above.

I can't see how Generalissimo Dick or Idiot Boy could pull off such a plot.

But at the same time, like most people, I don't have the time to read all the reports, from all sides, examining all the evidence.

To do so would be a full-time job and would take months.

2007-07-31 21:37:05 · answer #10 · answered by Austin W 3 · 0 5

I think Al Gore won in 2000 but he wasn't man enough to do anything about it. Do you remember that when Clinton was president and Gore was vice president the world trade center was bombed and nothing was done about it. Why done you blame them for 2001 bombing?

2007-07-31 20:26:59 · answer #11 · answered by Aunt Doobie 6 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers