English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They both have laws on the books that are not being enforced.

http://rds.yahoo.com/_ylt=A0geu8ctua9Go2ABsxVXNyoA;_ylu=X3oDMTFicGhmbmo2BHNlYwNzcgRwb3MDMQRjb2xvA2FjMgR2dGlkA01BUDAwNF8xMjIEbANXUzE-/SIG=127p7cpfn/EXP=1186007725/**http%3a//www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14096483/site/newsweek/

TANF set new rules. It eliminated the automatic entitlement to benefits. To qualify, mothers had to look for work, take job training or both (states set exact requirements). There was a general five-year lifetime limit on receiving benefits.

2007-07-31 11:36:21 · 2 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

2 answers

Both those on welfare and the illegal immigrants abuse their respective systems.

2007-08-01 01:57:31 · answer #1 · answered by gerafalop 7 · 0 0

Maybe because both mooch off of the system and both have the entitlement mentality that others are obligated to take care of them?

2007-07-31 18:40:13 · answer #2 · answered by lc 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers