both
2007-07-31 10:56:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by FUZZY 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Those that say that this is a dumb question, well, they answered it didnt they?
I retired from a prison where both pediphiles, rapist, killers, people that just like to torture small humans were imprisoned. I can tell you one thing, they can sure present themselves as such alluring people, all their charm is their snare...
I personally think the death penalty should be alive and working in all parts of the world.
If you rape a child or kill a child, or another human for that matter and it is proven through dna, etc. Dont let the scum set in prison at the taxpayers expense, slap them on a table and inject them with enough "juice" to take a death nap.
If the laws were tougher there would be less crime, if a man is gonna rape a person, he may think twice if he knows that death will be the result, would it be worth it? Killers, same thing, put them down....no metally ill excuses, I was in a drunken black out excuses, hands down, the death nap will be the punishment. If laws were enforced, the need for "lawyers" would be minimal, I have seen men that spent 17 years "hardtime" for check writting, and a man that beat his wife do 7 and out in 3 with "good behaviour", then beat another woman....the system is really screwed up
So to answer your question, one is not any better than the other in my books.....execute them both!
2007-07-31 11:09:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both are equally as bad. With a rapist, it will harm the child in a number of ways, and with a killer, it not only kills God's innocent child, but it kills the child's entire family on the inside. Both are awful and unjustified. Nothing can ever justify harming an innocent child....not even mental problems bc they know if they have a mental problem. It is down right cruel and nothing will ever make up for them taking that fom a child. He who does so should be hung by their toes, skinned alive, and tortured a little at a time until they eventually die,but it should be a slow slow slow death. And they should be hung for everyone to see and know what they did.
2007-07-31 11:01:11
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm going with the child rapist.
Here's my reasoning: If you kill someone (or a baby) it is over. Finished. Done. But abusing a child and leaving the child to grow up causes more mentally unstable people. Then it's all a downward spiral as those unstable people involve more people, and they involve more....you see where it's going.
2007-07-31 10:58:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i could could desire to assert the rapist, however this is a tricky one. The latter is a criminal offense of pastime, while the 1st is a criminal offense of want. The killer could desire to actual experience be apologetic approximately for his strikes, provided he's no longer a serial killer, who additionally derives one in each and every of those sexual gratification from killing. The rapist never fairly has be apologetic approximately because of the fact he's deriving exhilaration from raping. i could say this is like the adaptation between getting rather offended and hitting somebody or purposefully beating them up as a bully. One has foresight and is planned, together as the different is extra spontaneous
2016-12-11 06:24:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It actually is best not to compare the seriousness of either crime. Both will have a devastating affect on the child and the family. The perpetrator is generally someone without a conscience; therefore, they would not see either one or the other as worse. Only the victims and their families have the right to determine which is worse.
2007-07-31 11:04:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have a simple answer. A baby killing mother is just as bad as a child rapist because both acts kill a human being.
2007-07-31 11:00:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Child rapist. Usually baby killers are mental people or are just scared kids themselves that got pregnant and where too afraid to get an abortion or tell anyone about it.
2007-07-31 10:57:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by RedRabbit 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
What an awful choice.
Often a child rapist kills his victim, so it is about the same.
2007-07-31 11:01:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Lottie W 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
the rapist because the child has to live with it. An depenind of the cercomstance it's legal to kill a baby.
2007-07-31 11:13:11
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
EASYYYYYYYYYY! You are a true SICKO if you're a child rapist..... You should have your genitals burned...... And if you're a baby killer.....well a simple shot in the head would do.
2007-07-31 11:06:46
·
answer #11
·
answered by 2Starz 2
·
1⤊
0⤋