English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

IF THE WORLD MAKES IT TO 2008 AD AND THE FIRST OF TWO RAPTURE EVENTS HAS NOT YET OCCURED: THERE IS THE HIGHEST PROBABILITY THAT HILLARY CLINTON WILL WIN THE 2008 PRESIDENTAL ELECTION. DECEIVED "SOCCER MOMS", COLLLEGE STUDENTS "EN MASSE" LED BY ROCK STARS & BANDS AND MANY BRAINWASHED TO BELIEVE THAT PRESIDENT BUSH IS THE "DEVIL'S ADVOCATE" WILL VOTE FOR HILLARY AS "THE NEW SAVIOR" OF AMERICA POLITICS. HERE IS THE AMERICA THAT HILLARY CLINTON ENVISIONS FOR US ALL. NOTE:HILLARY CLINTON IS WEARING THE "MASK" OF A "MOVE TO THE CENTER" "CONSERVATIVE". DON'T LET HER FOOL YOU. BENEATH THAT DISGUISE IS A HARD- CORE, ULTRA-RADICAL, LIBERAL, SOCIALIST EXTREMEIST. REMEMBER TOO THAT HITLER CAME TO POWER AS THE LEADER OF THE "NATIONALIST SOCIALIST PARTY. THE ELECTION OF HILLARY CLINTON TO THE WHITE HOUSE WILL SEAL THE DOOM OF AMERICA JUST AS THE ELECTION OF ADOLF HITLER SEALED THE FATE OF NAZI GERMANY. HILLARY CLINTON IS ANTI- CHRISTIAN, ANTI-ISRAEL ANTI-GOD.

2007-07-31 10:25:25 · 14 answers · asked by sweet_lil_cricket 1 in Politics & Government Politics

14 answers

Hillary Clinton is a real threat, and paranoia has nothing to do with it. She has a hunger for power and she will do anything to get it, and if people don't understand that and elect her, then surely they deserve the fate that awaits them. They will be giving the same excuses that the Germans give when ask about bringing Hitler to power and they will be just as lame.

2007-08-01 01:53:32 · answer #1 · answered by grinslinger 5 · 2 3

Why are you typing in capitals? Are you on something?
All that you wrote in your question qualifies you to start a new crazy religious sect. Hillary is the Satan, let's throw garlic at her. What century are you living in? She gravitates to left, and so do millions of others. Nothing wrong with that. Don't vote for her. If people like you are the only other option, then it's no brainer for me. Besides, you say" if the world survives until 2008.." What does that mean, and who will lead us to destruction? Man, you are scary.

2007-08-08 10:28:32 · answer #2 · answered by VPOC 3 · 0 0

First... turn the caps off!

Second, all of the 'front runners' have the same political background and the same New World Order, AGENDA

http://zeitgeistmovie.com/

It is not paranoia... It is your common sense telling you something is not right...


As for the post prior to me... Our presidents are no longer elected. It is an illusion... Bush was not elected.. BOTH TIMES... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._election_voting_controversies,_Ohio
http://ohioelection2004.com/evidence.htm
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/10432334/was_the_2004_election_stolen

There is a HBO Documentary, http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-365586126885215066&q=hacking+democracy&total=63&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=0 that shows exactly how votes can be changed to determine the outcome of elections. The power behind our democracy, is in the hands of a few programers at major corporations...

Our democracy is only an illusion, that keeps us distracted and pacified..

SO, JUST LIKE HITLER... Our leaders were not elected either...

2007-08-05 12:13:55 · answer #3 · answered by Kacy H 5 · 0 2

So stated as "banning weapons" as a sort of gun administration IS a laudable reason, yet as with prayer, FAILS, miserably. The regulation abiding citizen obeys and disarms! good! you're saying! NO weapons. Sorry Charley, in straight forward terms the regulation abiding human beings have not got the weapons, the stupid idiots nonetheless DO because of the fact THEY, the stupid idiots do no longer care with regard to the regulation! So, YOU tell ME,,, what good DID THAT DO? You thoroughly disarmed the FEW people who had an option to shoot back! So, tell me lower back, HOW precisely does disarming the regulation abiding public end a stupid fool with a gun from taking drugs and taking drugs a action picture teach or a standard college? all your "gun unfastened zone" did grew to become into assure the stupid fool will haven't any danger from everybody being armed! no it is easy to have the skill to shoot back because of the fact they're regulation abiding voters! One shooter, assured NO danger from everybody being armed. So, tell me lower back, WHAT good DOES IT DO TO DISARM THE regulation ABIDING PUBLIC?

2016-10-08 22:24:54 · answer #4 · answered by Erika 3 · 0 0

You haven't said what we will have with Hillary in office.

Education for all
Health care for all
etc.
That's bad why???
We cut out the insurance companies. Does anyone like insurance companies?
I'm voting for Dennis Kucinich! He is the only candidate that truly impresses me.

2007-08-07 05:23:46 · answer #5 · answered by Unsub29 7 · 3 0

The threat is real because paranoids DO have enemies. They make them.

Just ranting in all caps without actually asking a question is usually enough to start me leaning that way.

Oh, and dude? Speed kills. Go back on your prescribed meds.

2007-08-08 07:26:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

First of all the word rapture is to be found nowhere in the bible. It does speak of wars and rumors of wars, which is what you are spreading. Second of all Hillary won't be voted in she had her chance 92 through 00. Third, What are your qualifications as a prophet? Did you score a couple of trifectas at the track?

Matthew 24:
4 And Jesus answered and said unto them, Take heed that no man deceive you.
5 For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
6 And ye shall hear of wars and rumours of wars: see that ye be not troubled: for all these things must come to pass, but the end is not yet.
7 For nation shall rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom: and there shall be famines, and pestilences, and earthquakes, in divers places.
8 All these are the beginning of sorrows.
9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake.
10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another.
11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many.
12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold.
13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.

2007-08-06 16:22:02 · answer #7 · answered by crazy frog 2 · 2 0

Paranoia is defined as a disturbed thought process characterized by excessive anxiety or fear, often to the point of irrationality and delusion.

By this definition, yes, a response to a real threat can be paranoid, if the reaction is excessive.

2007-08-02 10:42:51 · answer #8 · answered by silussa 1 · 2 0

It will sure make for an interesting inagural ball, if nothing else. My guess would be that Hillary will have the first dance with one of her lesbian friends, while Bill gets a quickie in the limo on the way over...

2007-08-07 12:20:46 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

It's not paranoia when the threat is real.

Our instincts are often correct when they tell us there IS a threat. But our instincts are non specific. They only give us a vague idea of the nature of the danger. We have to use reason and logic to identify what the threat actually is and where it comes from.

2007-07-31 23:28:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers