Is the NAACP wrong to support Michael Vick?

Question

Read this article:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/news;_ylt=ArShYy58ozLCqZQjAcjBYwj.uLYF?slug=ap-vick-naacp&prov=ap&type=lgns

A tax-exempt social service organization needs to be careful where they put their support. Vick has been anything but a good role model for anyone, and deserves to be kicked to the curb without ceremony.

Do you think it's wrong to spend precious resources and influence to support negative individuals, regardless of how rich or talented they may be?

To William R: We all know the rules of jurisprudence in the US. Who is the NAACP to tell us, the court of popular opinion, to follow the same rules as a court of law? That takes chutzpah, at the least!

The NAACP knows that millions of accused minority people plead guilty or make plea bargains each year because they haven't got the $$$ to hire a battery of attorneys like Mr. Vick does. Many of those people are victims of mistaken identity, false confessions by others, etc.

Where is anyone's sense of honor in this situation? Sports figures used to take their millions and open summer camps for disadvantaged youth; this man is (at minimum) spending significant amounts of his precious time associating with seriously depraved individuals engaged in similarly degrading activities.

If he's a spoiled brat who hasn't the decency to admit any responsibility, the NAACP should have pointed that out to him.

Answer 1

I agree with the other posters who have said that the NAACP wasn't very concerned with 'innocent until proven guilty" in the Duke Lacrosse case, and they have yet to apologize for their stance in that case, yet they have the ***** to suggest that we should all wait for the verdict before we form a opinion of Michael Vick's innocence or guilt. Also the other's brought up a good point, there are so many other blacks who cannot afford council and who are in jail and will stay there to serve a sentence for crimes they did not commit. Those are the people who need the support of the NAACP. Also, the President of the ATlanta NAACP chapter made a statement that if Michael Vick is found guilty they will not condemn his actions. I do believe he meant condone, but the fella is confused on so many different levels, lol.

As for the poster who mentioned Al Sharpton, well he has spoken out weeks ago asking Michael Vick's endorsement companies to suspend his contracts. The NAACP is down on him for that, and Russell Simmons as well.

Answer 2

Yeah. Although I do not think they are actually supporting him, they are really saying wait for a court to decide, I still think the NAACP is wrong here. I really wish, they would not have done this. I think it is a very bad move and will diminish their credibility. Vick is not even a good role model, Why would the NAACP use their precious time and resources on Vick, there are much more worthy causes out there.

Answer 3

I think so for a number of reasons:
1. There was enough evidence to indict Vick on dog fighting charges.
2. As of now he hasn’t been wrongly accused, the trial will decide that.
3. Vick has the money to hire the best lawyers who will make sure he gets a fair trial.
4. This isn’t even close to a race issue.
5. There is so many cases in America where black men and women are being wrongfully accused and the NAACP lets them sit in jail. Race is a huge problem in this country, and the NAACP needs to pick better battles, not popular ones.

Answer 4

What was the NAACP stance to the stripper in the Duke case.I am sure they were all for convicting some white lacrosse players before the courts got a chance.

The problem is organizations like the NAACP, and people like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton quite often pick the wrong battles to fight. And then when they are wrong are not man enough to apologize.

Answer 5

The statement I heard from the NAACP simply stated that any condemnation of Vick should wait until after he has had his due process under the law. No problems there. As far as the NFL suspending him or even Nike dropping him as a client, that is their right. The allegations alone against Vick are bad for the image of the NFL and Nike and they have every right to distance themselves from him.

Answer 6

Thank god my lady, you're right on the money on this assessment, the NAACP need to stick to theirs other concern, not the Vick and his dogfighting. Vick has not been a good citizen to warrant the NAACP help. The NAACP need to stick to theirs priority which is social well being of the peoples of colors. Vick is another good example of rich athletes miss behavior. The NAACP lately been sticking theirs nose into Politics and that not what the organization is based on.

Answer 7

I have no problem with the NAACP's stance on Vick. They have a long history of backing the wrong people so this is certainly nothing new for them. And when he's convicted you won't hear boo from them.

Answer 8

Is it simply moral support or are they providing dollars either directly or indirectly?

i think it would be wrong of them to put up dollars for it...far better ways to use money.

I don't think it's necessarily right or wrong of them to ask the public to withhold their judgment until the case is decided...but that's like spitting in the wind. I'm fed to the teeth with people saying "innocent until proven guilty" that's in a court of law people...the court of public opinion is not, has never been, and never will be, subject to such a standard. People have a right to their own opinions and to voice them..however right or wrong they may be.

Answer 9

The NAACP being taken seriously as social service organization and having a voice that the general public has to listen to is wrong.

Answer 10

So, I comprehend you have been there modern-day, seeing him abuse a newborn? You look to have understanding no one else does. It grew to grow to be glaring that the newborn's mom became in it for the money. i for my section don't be conscious of if he's a pedophile or not, yet i've got self belief it extremely is incorrect to accuse him without understanding. like the previous slander of "the place there is smoke there is fireplace". think of if I accused you of being a pedophile, yet could not tutor it in court docket. Then perhaps you sued me and gained. some years later human beings might nonetheless be touching on you as "the guy who became accused of being a pedophile, yet have been given away with it". Grossly unfair, do not you think of? i for my section locate the guy creepy for particularly some motives. If he's harmless of pedophilia, he's amazingly stupid and naive, yet then i think of there is already sufficient data of that. So - come back once you have some evidence. Act like a "genuine American" is meant to act.