English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

All Clintonite's accuse us for passing the buck, if we blame Clinton for this but he is stilll to blame, Clinton is the man to blame for the lives lost in Iraq...

Only 2 weeks after Clinton took office the US was attacked then 5 more times the steps he took would be in fact his blame if he left America in danger.....

Clinton had obligations he never faced, he was more worried about leaving office with a budget, that he would be remembered for.

Clintonite's blame the republican control congress in his term. Clinton Let bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize Republicans in congress urged him to accept when Sudan offered up the terrorist and data on his network.

President Clinton and his national security team ignored several opportunities to capture Osama bin Laden and his terrorist associates.

Blame Clinton he earned that right!

2007-07-31 09:48:44 · 27 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

27 answers

and the sad part about it is the liberal whackos still seem to want to give a pass on the clinton..."legacy"

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court

2007-07-31 11:47:40 · answer #1 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 3 2

i think of that there are too many aspects to place fault as to why it began. although, i think of that George Bush's head is so some distance up his own *** that he could no longer ingredient out on a map the place u.s. is presently occupying. this is as though he's the little boy who's so afraid that he's going to be bullied that he finally ends up lashing out at each and every person else. i latterly had a communique with a colleague and we desperate that the u . s . a . needs counsel from something of the international. subsequently, for the time of your next election, WE, the voters of the planet, ought to get a vote. No offence meant, you have many clever human beings. It basically did no longer look that way after the final 2 elections. I propose particularly, getting voted in for a 2d term... are you kidding me? How the hell did that ensue? Oops, this has grow to be a rant. What grew to become into the question? I get excitement from the thumbs down, it potential that each and every person is paying interest. the certainty hurts.

2016-11-10 20:23:19 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

OK, when you saw "The Path to 9/11" on ABC, did you not read the small text at the beginning that said "this is a dramatization"? Meaning not everything was fact?

"Clinton Let bin Laden Slip Away and Metastasize"

That never happened, period. Clinton never had a chance to get bin Laden.

"President Clinton and his national security team ignored several opportunities to capture Osama bin Laden and his terrorist associates."

Again, never happened.

2007-07-31 09:59:52 · answer #3 · answered by Pfo 7 · 2 2

Not to mention that 3 bin Laden attacked the USS Cole under Clinton. Then 3 months later Bush took office. But Bush never went after bin Laden for that attack on a US warship. Almost like Bush didn't care about bin Laden.

"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

2007-07-31 09:58:59 · answer #4 · answered by expose_neocons 3 · 4 1

We can blame clinton for 9/11 as long as we can blame any future terror threats on Bush for not even trying to catch Osama. I'll take it a step further anytime our country is attacked for here until eternity the rule can be to blame the prseident before him because how dare we make our current president accountable for our saferty. Give me a break

2007-07-31 09:57:02 · answer #5 · answered by Bye-Partisan 3 · 6 1

So how's the weather on that fantasy planet you live on? You might want to stay there - here on Earth it's getting warmer, but I somehow have the feeling that isn't happening in your fantasyland.

"Republicans in congress urged him to accept when Sudan offered up the terrorist and data on his network. "

Not here on Earth. Here on Earth, Sudan never actually offered Bin laden to Clinton, although the same Republicans who, when Clinton attacked Sudan for its links to Bin Laden, howled that he was trying to use terrorism to distract the nation from more important questions like blow jobs like to pretend it did.

"President Clinton and his national security team ignored several opportunities to capture Osama bin Laden and his terrorist associates."

Another thing that never actually happened.

With Conservatives like you, it's no wonder that reality has such a strong liberal bias.

2007-07-31 10:15:13 · answer #6 · answered by A M Frantz 7 · 2 3

The Clinton administration might rightly bear some of the blame for the situation that led to 9/11, but Bush's decision to respond with an ill-concieved "War on Terror" was all his.

2007-07-31 10:02:15 · answer #7 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 2 2

The Path To 9-11...first start in the Oval Office and locate the Clinton semen stains on the carpet...follow that path for 8 miserable years...completely ignoring the islamo facist menance along the way...take a few side trips off the path to lie to Federal Grand jurys...and pardon 100's of know criminals.

PS: Where can I find out more info on the School Don C attended to get his Masters Degree as a Clinton Apologist?

2007-07-31 09:55:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 5

I am sorry but 911 happened under Bush`s watch and we was warned and did nothing. In 08` I will remember how the Republicans let someone like Bush get this far in the first place and I will not forgive.

2007-07-31 09:55:04 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

Don't take this the wrong way, but........lets say Hillary is elected President. 9 months after she is sworn in the terrorist blow up the Sears Tower in Chicago and Empire State Building in NYC, 3,000 people die. Who's fault will it be? President Bush because he just left office or Hillary's for not stopping it in her first 9 months on the job????

2007-07-31 09:56:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers