Isn't it realised that if drugs like pot and coke were legal it would re-vitalize the economy and bring and genrate new money?
2007-07-31 09:21:36 · 12 answers · asked by James V 3 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
Certain people in positions of power stand to make more money from prohibition than they would from decriminalisation.
2007-07-31 09:24:44 · answer #1 · answered by Alowishus B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How do you figure that out? The only person/people who would make money is the drug dealers. Oh NO, wait. The government would also make money because of the taxes. But that's it. So how do you figure it would revitalize our economy? NOT to mention the FACT that drugs DO KILL all to many people. DID YOU forget that little fact?
2007-07-31 10:11:50 · answer #2 · answered by GRUMPY 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Drugs are a killer for some folks. They should stay away from them, for their own good. But adults should be making their own decisions about this. The government should have no role, except to tax their sale to support rehabilitation programs.
2007-07-31 10:25:56 · answer #3 · answered by jackbutler5555 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The interior sight American church is the only team that makes use of peyote. and additionally try to be conscious of that they are frequently frowned upon via maximum persons of Natives, who've consistently been against making use of recommendations-changing drugs. in actuality, the peyote church became outlawed via each and all the reservations, and not till the US government stepped in and reported we had to tolerate them, have been they waiting to function brazenly. we actually do not evaluate them to be a valid form of any interior sight custom. That reported, even the peyote customers do not use it recreationally, yet ceremonially, and in an particularly dilute style.
2016-10-01 03:15:03 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Certain drugs will remain
off the market ,until the
government finds a way
to make a profit off of them.
2007-07-31 09:26:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
If coke were legal and encouraged, you'd have a bunch of addicts on your hands who don't want to work, and are more concerned about their next fix than anything else... I don't see how that would help, they'd be so out of it (eventually) that they're useless
2007-07-31 09:28:21 · answer #6 · answered by wot 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
pot is a lot cheaper to grow & process than tobacco, joints would only be 5 cents each & everyone would gain 200lbs from the munchies, busses & cars would have to be twice as big to carry them & use twice as much fuel so it would bad for the environment unless the gov. gave out free speed to keep their weight down then the whole country would be WHACK
2007-07-31 09:32:58 · answer #7 · answered by Who Dat ? 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
crack is whack.
How fun would be to have a bunch of coke heads and dope addicts running around town looking for a fix?
Doesnt sound like fun to me.
And why would i want to pay twice what i already have to pay for dankbud?
2007-07-31 09:23:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
Lawmakers are using them.
2007-07-31 09:24:10 · answer #9 · answered by eniles21 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yea,then ppl would have an EXCUSE to act like a retarded jerk
2007-07-31 09:24:55 · answer #10 · answered by sweetone11211 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋