Why did the law firm of Bush 41 Secretary of State James Baker represent the government of Saudi Arabia......?

Question

when the families of 9/11 victims filed a lawsuit against it?

An alumni of the same firm, Robert Jordan, currently serves as US Ambassador to Saudi Arabia and was previously George W Bush's personal lawyer.

Bush's buddies CHOSE to be the adversary of the families of 9/11 victims.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3067906

Answer 1

first of all, you're spinning things.. baker botts is one of the largest, most prestigious law firms on the planet... someone who is not familiar with our laws obviously has to have council to look after their interests in a foreign land.. and secondly, yes, the saudi royals have certain ties to the bush family.. sooo, obviously they're gonna go with who their ties have ties with.. just like if you got into trouble with the law,, and you had a buddy who had a friend in a law firm.. you'd go with them right? especially if they had the kind of reputation baker botts has... look, i think the saudis need to pay up. i don't think they KNOWINGLY support terrorist. they obviously make considerable donations to organizations that the US has deemed as having terrorism ties... i think this will enlighten our saudi partners as to the problems they create with their money. buuuut, just like here in the states.. even the most guilty of guilty have the right to a fair trial and counsel. the saudis have plllleeeeenty of money to hire the best counsel.. and they have.

Answer 2

Bush is a risk and possibility to the peace and risk-free practices of, no longer basically u.s., the full international. What he (he and persons in his administration) does and has been doing all alongside grew to become into designed as a potential to conceal up previous wrongdoings. They made many errors consistent with judgment. it particularly is a few thing that Obama, Hillary, and others (different US Presidential applicants) could, additionally, do and repeat. The Bush administration is variety of a militia usual long gone incorrect or maybe insane during the conflict. If he's permitted to proceed, existence will strengthen worst and there would come a time while those circumstances grow to be impossible to opposite. i'm in prefer of halting the sale of all such weapons, till good human beings in u.s. and Congress can see their way of course, examine the damages, and rectify a situation long gone particularly intense and intensely undesirable. No weapons ought to be offered to any u . s . a ., in the propose time, as such international locations will or would abuse their capability and with an all-out conflict (international conflict III), our u . s . a . could be too busy to prosecute the President and his adult men. at a similar time as human beings do issues which they sense will keep them risk-free, they are basically mendacity to themselves. risk-free practices is in goodness. it particularly is in numbers of excellent human beings, attempting their maximum suitable to do good issues in this international formerly this is too late! Max .

Answer 3

The Bush family has strong ties to Saudi Arabia.

The Bin Laden family help fund Lil' Bushes first oil company.

Answer 4

Saudi Arabia has OIL. For the Bully Bush Gang, OIL trumps dead Americans..

Answer 5

Right... It doesn't really matter. They don't choose their clients, their clients come to them. There is a professional relationship where you may not believe what you're arguing, but you do your job. That's the American system of justice- everybody gets a lawyer.

Answer 6

Maybe because people are suing Saudi Arabia for something they didn't do.

Answer 7

Why shouldn't they? Isn't that what lawyers do, represent clients?

Answer 8

I'm SHOCKED

Could it have something to do with OIL????

Answer 9

9/11 was friendly fire.