Vote Ron Paul 2008
2007-07-31 07:02:18 · 16 answers · asked by Honey Girl 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Oh my God YES!!!!!
Those two can't even spell Constitution....much less uphold it.
2007-07-31 07:05:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
I cannot vouch for his IQ level .. Hillary's is reported to be about 135 or so.
BUT he is more honest and likable than them both.
We all know what Hillary is, so I need not denigrate her further than need be... She does it well enough just by breathing.
I smell something funny about Obama, an unknown slick snake oils salesman with no experience. I am distrustful of anyone that appears out of nowhere and is put before the people to run. It usually denotes NWO promotion as it did with Clinton, Thatcher, Harper, Brown, Blair and Arnold S.
Dr. Paul has a proven record... he has not uttered a single lie in his campaigns or in his past record. He has always walked his OWN PATH FOR THE PEOPLE.
Henry V!!! could help .. instead of spouting negativity he could HELP. He seems to think dollars are all that makes one matter. He also is allowing the media mainstream do his thinking for him by telling him who is "good enough" (read SOLD out enough) to be the President. If enough people were optimistic and worked together a small change could be brought about.
Instead of woosing out the people need to say.. HECK let this man speak. People complain that Dr. Paul's supporters are flooding the internet. Well what else can they do.. the internet is a tool of the people and Dr. Paul is OF THE PEOPLE. If the mainstream media is against him, he is using what is available at his disposal.
By ignoring him the media is showing that they are afraid of his potential strength and power.
AND, recently the Chinese Masters of Washington (financially speaking) passed on an edict to the current administration that should harm come to "Dr. Paul and and the truth tellers of the West" that the consequences could be serious to America on a financial level.
Unfortunately I cannot find the link as proof. But I would say, Dr. Paul, given half a chance, would sweep the next presidential race.
It is up to us to ensure that he receives that chance! If you don't do your part, you will never know what just might be.
2007-07-31 14:17:02 · answer #2 · answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
It doesn't matter although I don't think he is. Either way he is a L O S E R. Most people don't even know who he is nor do they care. He has not nearly enough money to buy time to advertise who he is. Face it he is going to lose big time. He won't even get 1% of the Republican vote let alone be nominated and expect to get elected in the general election.
I know realism escapes Ron Paul supporters but it's okay the Tooth Fairy, Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny exist too don't they?
2007-07-31 14:09:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Smarter? I doubt it. President Clinton had the highest recorded IQ of any U.S. President and Sen. Clinton's is higher than his. Obama's no slouch either. Sorry, I just don't think someone so smart would start out alienating his possible voting base by being an American apologist and then act surprised when people take offense. Seems the American people in general are smarter than him, he can't get over 3% in any national poll you can find. He isn't even smart enough to figure out that we can't be isolationists in this world atmosphere - he has very naive ideas about foreign policy.
2007-07-31 14:09:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
In terms of understanding the fundamental principles on which the United States was founded on, than yes.
I also support him for President in '08
2007-07-31 14:10:31 · answer #5 · answered by Diamond24 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, it's just that he's a liberarian and his views make sense to you. One thing to think about: libertarian theories have NEVER been tested on a wide scale. Other political ideologies such as neoconservativism sounded good on paper too. They just didn't work out in practice.
2007-07-31 14:07:00 · answer #6 · answered by TxSup 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
An amoeba is smarter than Hillary. She can't even go to the bathroom unless the polls show she has to.
2007-07-31 14:06:13 · answer #7 · answered by steven_p_ohio 3 · 3⤊ 4⤋
Heck yes!
2007-07-31 14:10:57 · answer #8 · answered by kaisergirl 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Not necessarily. His isolationist ideas are pretty frightening, and unrealistic when considering the globally intertwined economies of the world.
2007-07-31 14:04:55 · answer #9 · answered by Frank 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
He was smart enough to vote against illegal immigration, but was the other two that you mentioned?
NOPE!
2007-07-31 14:07:00 · answer #10 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Are you serious? Hilary was running the country when Bill was in office. She by far is the smartest.
2007-07-31 14:04:54 · answer #11 · answered by S 1 · 3⤊ 6⤋