Yes, the urban legends site debunks these lies. Go to http://www.snopes.com and search the word "clinton".
Common sense also tells us it cannot be true. Ken Star investigated the Clintons for years and found nothing. Star's inquiry was not a puny investigation by a local southern sheriff, it was a full fledged inquiry by a special counsel into anything the Clintons may have done as adults. He spent $48 million in taxpayer dollars, and found nothing of this kind, just an adulterous affair by Bill.
2007-07-31 06:49:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by TxSup 5
·
7⤊
2⤋
As a staunch and fierce opponent of all things Clinton, I have to say that this is a crock of manure. The Clintons did not kill these people.
If you're going to counter the Clintonistas, the facts about Hillary and her corruption should more than suffice.
Suffice it to say, however, that the Clintons are friends with a lot of shady characters at various legal statuses, especially with respect to drug convictions, and it is not surprising that some may be involved with other illegal activities.
2007-07-31 06:53:50
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
thank you Ernest and Lonewolf, for people who don't think this to be actual, seem up the information memories. The library has those style of interior the information. what share presidents have misplaced 10 physique guards so suspiciously. I had the print out of this till now and this is documented actuality. of direction it may desire to never be legally tied to Clinton. twist of fate? i think of no longer! No different President, Democrat, or Republican had plenty secret and controversy with a lot of deaths and disappearances. We could never be responsive to what rather occurred, or why.
2016-12-11 06:05:13
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
How do you prove Hillary did anything? She could rob a bank; have 20 witnesses and a record on camera & all the liberal media would say she was set up by cons.
Vince Foster's office wasn't ransacked?
Hillary didn't steal FBI files to threaten her political opponenets?
Hillary wasn't guilty in White Water?
Hillary didn't supress evidence?
Hillary didn't lead the charge attacking the many, many victims of Billy's harrassments, rapes, affairs?
Hillary didn't sell pardons to criminals for kickbacks?
Hillary didn't take everything not nailed down, when she vacated the WH?
There is no proof of Billary's murders, if there was, it would be suppressed like all her other crimes. Sorry, liberal apologists, but just because your ideology prevented Hillary of convictions for her numerous crimes, does not mean she didn't do it.
2007-07-31 06:54:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
There were so many rumors of this happening when Bill was in the White House. I'm a bit surprised more people haven't brought this up already. Proof? Never seen any myself.
2007-07-31 06:51:25
·
answer #5
·
answered by ladydi_1987 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
You don't need to verify this rumor. Her voting record is bad enough. She voted for the war and she had the information that the reasons were all lies. This is why she doesn't like to answer questions on this subject and always diverts them and bullsh*** her way out of them.
Senator Mike Gravel is the candidate for me. He is the only one that supports Voting On The Internet, or Real Democracy in America and he was ONE of the very few Senators who helped stop the NIXON SERIAL MURDER SPREE in South Viet Nam. He is the real anti-war candidate. ALL the others do NOTHING about it when they could be doing what Senator Gravel did in 1973.
2007-07-31 06:54:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Don't get me wrong, I dislike Hillary, but I should think that such strong allegations would require actual proof. A link to a reliable website might help here.
As we so often say, we are innocent until proven guilty in this country. Hillary supporters should not have to prove her innocence; you should have to prove her guilt.
2007-07-31 06:50:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Terras 5
·
6⤊
0⤋
I've never been a fan of Hillary's, but I've also never seen actual proof that she anyone bumped off. Plenty of theories and speculations though!
2007-07-31 06:54:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by cassandra_sd 3
·
4⤊
0⤋
Any proof these are truths? the burden of proof falls on you since in this country, you are innocent until PROVEN guilty.
2007-07-31 07:09:29
·
answer #9
·
answered by thequeenreigns 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Any proof that this is true?...
Usually to prove some one guilty of murder the burden of proof is on the accuser...
David m: Jinx!
2007-07-31 06:48:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ryan F 5
·
7⤊
0⤋