It appears that Mexico has decided to send all of their criminals, deadbeats, and undesirable citizens to the United States. And our government agreed to accept these people so that they can become cheap labor to do "the jobs that Americans don't want to do." (I love that phrase!)
Maybe this "agreement" is not so secret. It actually began with President Clinton's North American Free Trade Agreement, (NAFTA). (That was just one of his many ineternational blunders.) And now it is being accelerated by President Bush. If things keep going the way they are America will have no sovereignty left. What do you think? Is the Mexican government and the U.S. government in a shady agreement here, or is this just a bunch of people who happen to be over running the Southern border at the same period of time? Why aren't the two governments doing more to stop this than just pushing paper around in Washington? Give me your opinion and why you feel the way you do.
2007-07-31 05:37:15 · 8 answers · asked by wildcatfan 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Probably....why do you think they're having hearings today on Ramos and Campion? It was the Mexican Gov't that instituted the investigation.....
"........no criminal investigation of the agents began until after the Mexican consulate complained the agents violated Aldrete-Davila's civil rights by shooting him without warrant....."
".....The hearings were called after Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R.-Calif., ranking member on Internal Organizations, Human Rights, and Oversight of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, expressed concern about possible foreign influence in the prosecution.
The government has not disclosed all communications between the Mexican Consulate and the U.S. government concerning the Ramos-Compean case....."
2007-07-31 05:54:14 · answer #1 · answered by Cookies Anyone? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"It appears that Mexico has decided to send all of their criminals, deadbeats, and undesirable citizens to the United States"
Wrong, Mexico is not sending anyone, the people living in south and central American voluntarily choose to come here illegally of their own will.
"And our government agreed to accept these people so that they can become cheap labor to do "the jobs that Americans don't want to do."
Wrong again, the government does not enforce the policy as much as it should, but it certainly does not accept them with open arms, and they jobs they do ARE jobs that Americans don't want to do.
"Maybe this "agreement" is not so secret. It actually began with President Clinton's North American Free Trade Agreement, (NAFTA)"
NAFTA lowered tarifs and encouraged American jobs to go to Mexico.
"Why aren't the two governments doing more to stop this than just pushing paper around in Washington?"
The former governments of the illegals can't help them. Our government needs the cheap labor. It's a win-win situation for them, the only people who lose are lower class Americans competing for a cheaper work force. I feel sorry for them, they think they have nothing and that they get stepped on, but the illegals have it worse, and they don't complain.
2007-07-31 05:50:34 · answer #2 · answered by Pfo 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. No formal collusion is required. Everyone involved is simply acting on thier own self-interest. The American gov wants to bolster the population, to prop up failing businesses and failing social programs (especially social security) with cheap labor and increased tax rolls, so they simply leave immigration law unenforced. The Mexican gov wants to stimulate it's corruption-addled economy with remitance payments from workers outside it's borders, so it encourages it's people to seek employment in 'the North.' The American gov would accept illegal immigrants from anywhere (and does), but, by an accident of geography, Mexico happens to provide the most.
2007-07-31 05:45:31 · answer #3 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In my opinion, we are being set up so as to eradicate the boarder. This is part of the NAU plan as well as setting up a stream of new immigrants to the US. I also believe that soon Mexican factories will be replacing the Chinese ones.
2007-07-31 05:43:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I wouldn't be suprised. I have a hard time believing they can't control the issue.....
Why couldn't we be where Canada is? lol
Then they'd be the ones with the "problem"
2007-07-31 05:42:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes of course we are.
We want more lawlessness in the streets, murder, mayhem so we can crack down and install a nazi government as a result.
----------------------------------------------------------- hey, come to think of it, you could be right. Can you say Bush and the Patriotic Act of doing the slow screw to our bill of rights?
Peace
Jim
.
2007-07-31 05:59:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Again, I would not put ANYTHING past Bush.
2007-07-31 05:46:26 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
bingo, next question
2007-07-31 05:40:23 · answer #8 · answered by train120 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋