If you count the Bush 1 VP, it will have been 28 years at the end of Bush 2’s term. If you don’t it’ll be 20 YEARS!!! And now people want to vote in Hillary Clinton!? It might be 24, 28, 32 or 36 years of Bush/Clinton.
IT’S TIME FOR A CHANGE. Am I wrong?
2007-07-31 05:11:18 · 14 answers · asked by Incognito 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Jon H- I WISH, lol. It's just a little slow at work today.
2007-07-31 05:17:01 · update #1
carlisleorama- their policies are not the same, obviously. But Bush, Clinton, Bush, Clinton.....see a pattern developing? see how the country is so divided? see how almost everyone is a disenfranchized voter? see how fed up everyone is? Hillary is just going to continue this pattern.
2007-07-31 05:20:39 · update #2
supercell- frightening, truly frightening
2007-07-31 05:24:15 · update #3
Adam you are wo right; I wouldn't vote for another Bush or Clinton even if they were on the same ticket (which they might as well be).
2007-07-31 05:13:35 · answer #1 · answered by netjr 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely...It may be time or past time we give some consideration to examining a Parliamentary form of government in order to "exorcise" these stale and corrupt entities who've haunted Washington for far too long. Have we basically turned into a kind of "revolving door monarchy" where a few families and their heirs run our country? How big are the REAL differences between the two major parties and their actual agendas? There is a cult of politicians in Washington who pull the strings and push the buttons. This cult goes far deeper than the obvious candidates. Being a progressive I will vote for Hillary as a last choice. Being an American I will reluctantly vote Democrat if need be. Being a member of the human race I'd prefer to see a complete revision in our government.
2007-07-31 05:13:43 · answer #2 · answered by Don W 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I don't disagree with you, for the most part. But is it really fair to compare the Clinton's to the Bush's just because Hillary is running now? I know democrats are hardly different than republicans, but come on. At least Clinton pretended not to be a war criminal instead of rubbing it in everyone's face.
2007-07-31 05:15:32 · answer #3 · answered by carlisleorama 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
They are both so hated by the opposition that it is time for a change. We need to become less divided not more divided. If we elect either another Clinton or Bush it will only serve to further polarize the country.
2007-07-31 05:24:59 · answer #4 · answered by barry c 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
We will probably have at least 4 years of a Clinton.
Then watch for Jeb in 2012 or 2016!!!
2007-07-31 05:21:21 · answer #5 · answered by Supercell 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I, too, would prefer to see someone else get the job.
If his last name were not Bush, Jeb would be the frontrunner for the 2008 nomination.
2007-07-31 05:49:28 · answer #6 · answered by American citizen and taxpayer 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, we don't need political dynasties ruling America, especially given the fact that the executive office has grabbed way too much power.
2007-07-31 05:22:24 · answer #7 · answered by TxSup 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I like Edwards or Biden and will vote that way in the primary
2007-07-31 05:19:21 · answer #8 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The Bush "era" definantly has.
2007-07-31 05:29:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
dude...the elction is coming up soon. Asking these question isnt going to do squat except perhaps make you angry.
Most Americans would like a new president but until that day comes, its pointless to complain about it.
2007-07-31 05:15:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋