English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-07-31 04:33:10 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

how about military blockades on top of all economic sanctions / embargoes ?

2007-07-31 04:37:19 · update #1

22 answers

yes but consider this china is the most powerful nation next to U.S.A and the korean war taught us not to underestimate what china can do so an embargo could backfire just as the iraq war has. we must control what comes in but do it by being smart.rember it our big corperations who are behind alot of the problems by shipping the jobs over to china

2007-07-31 04:44:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

in the West i do no longer think of that we comprehend the style of collective identity among the chinese language peoples and that i take advantage of the be conscious peoples intentionally to contain the various minorities. this may be a usa with a collective 4000 year historic previous that has very much inspired China and its mindset in direction of the non chinese language international. specially China is an pretty proud usa and this starting to be nationalism has been very much inspired by using the Olympics and the importance China places on it as their 2nd in the solar. The torch runs have shown thousands and thousands of chinese language out in the streets spontaneously celebrating their excitement of having "their" Olympics. This interprets right into a starting to be experience of nationhood and delight as may be seen by using the countless flags being waved. Now whilst China feels threatened by using an exterior capacity this sense of nationalism would be considerable. it is likewise a large way for the national government to divert interest from kinfolk issues. If something is achieved to disrupt the Olympics the chinese language human beings would be livid. the main important concern in China top now could be wealth distribution. a great sort of human beings are earning a great sort of money although this is no longer putting out to the grass roots. the government is doing little or no approximately this and there's a widening hollow between an pretty wealthy type, a starting to be midsection type and the final public of the chinese language human beings. existence in the cities may be good yet existence in the rustic continues to be tough perplexing and extremely no longer ordinary to make money.there's a solid danger that rural dissent ought to enhance and it is the reason why the stern controls are nonetheless there. that's going to be a protracted time, if ever, in the previous China will become a real democracy with one individual one vote.

2016-10-08 21:50:35 · answer #2 · answered by bergman 4 · 0 0

No, Russia has a huge border with China and it would always support its neighbour. Blocking by sea is relatively easy if the US were to do it. The Chinese dont have the Navy or the Airforce to counter 2 or 3 Nimitz class carrier battle groups.

Economically for the whole world, it would be a disaster. China is a key player in so many industries that it would crash all the stock markets and ruin daily life in ways you couldnt believe.
It would be an extremely desperate situation if economic sanctions were attempted to be imposed on China. It might cause a new cold war, with the west on one side and Russia and China on the other.

2007-07-31 05:23:04 · answer #3 · answered by futuretopgun101 5 · 0 1

I'm sure if the US so wanted, it could find a reason to back economic sanctions on China. But that would have DISASTROUS effects on the US economy, given that China is among the largest exporters to the US, and already holds a ton of US assets we sold off to pay for all the crap we buy from them. Trying to sanction China would trigger the equivalent of a nuclear war, economically speaking. And that's why the Chinese are not only a favored trading partner, but they also have ridiculously favorable trade terms already -- anything so as not to piss them off and ruin that relationship...

2007-07-31 04:39:05 · answer #4 · answered by gallo 3 · 0 0

Its very possible to impose economic sanctions against the Chinese considering they are so dependent on exporting goods through seaports. Blockade the ports, and you will choke the Chinese economy to death.

I think the Chinese are not dumb enough allow their economic existence to be choked so they would sort of comply with the West or aggressively oppose the blockade.

2007-07-31 04:55:01 · answer #5 · answered by The Stylish One 7 · 0 0

The US and China need each other right now. Don't know what we'd accomplish by sanctions against China.

They own a lot of our debt too. Probably don't want to piss them off too much.

2007-07-31 04:44:29 · answer #6 · answered by Incognito 5 · 0 0

Its possible, but it would be like a murder/suicide. The world economy has become incredibly intertwined, and this isn't a new thing. The Smoot-Hawley tariffs and other nation's anti-trade policies had a lot to do with aggrevating and exporting the great depression and setting the despair necessary to begin WW2.

2007-07-31 04:42:20 · answer #7 · answered by freedom first 5 · 0 0

No, not possible, but for the cheap goods we import (made by slave labor - wage slaves) , our worsening standard would be all too obvious, there would be mass protests leading to a revolution. Also China is holding much of it's currency reserves in both dollar and pounds, it could sell them at any time, and their value would plummet.

China cannot be bullied.

2007-07-31 05:38:04 · answer #8 · answered by . 5 · 0 0

It's no longer possible. We outsource so much of our manufacturing that it would hurt us tremendously. People keep mentioning Wal Mart, but it goes MUCH deeper than that. Half the stuff that is under the hood of your American made vehicle, is manufactured in China as well as a few other countries.

2007-07-31 04:38:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

There will be a falling out with China and not to worry everything will be made in our neighbor to the south.

2007-07-31 04:42:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers