English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Should that pedophile that is on the news be charged with violating childrens rights to NOT be subject to known sites of lust? If a child is harmed because of his pictures, can't he be charged with instigating the crime?

More to the point, would it not be moral to have laws barring ANY photos of children in sites that are not commercial in nature?

I would think the child has a right to NOT have their image used on sites geared for the "pleasure" of viewing them.

What are your thoughts?

2007-07-31 04:25:05 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

There is a difference of a crowd shot with a child being run in the news, or for a commercial, and a child being shown in a crowd on a site of just girls.

2007-07-31 05:06:40 · update #1

4 answers

I think that ANY predation of a child should mean life in prison, no possibility of parole and hard labor.

2007-07-31 04:29:23 · answer #1 · answered by essentiallysolo 7 · 1 1

I don't think that pictures of any child should be allowed to be posted anywhere without the consent of the parents. But I'm not sure if there is currently a law to that effect. And it creates a problem with crowd shots - how do you take a picture of a crowd or a tourist attraction and make sure there are no children in it?

2007-07-31 05:01:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It is actually legal to be a pedophile. The definition of a pedophile is one who is attracted to children. Being attracted to children is not illegal. It is ACTING on that attraction that is absolutely 100% bury the person under the jail illegal.

And while a site geared to looking at young girls is definitely creepy, if it is not illegal then he cannot be charged with anything.

--edited to ask.... Why on earth would I get a thumbs down on what I said?!?!?!

2007-07-31 05:05:53 · answer #3 · answered by Dan 2 · 1 1

I hate that this creep has found a legal loop hole and is using it for his sick pleasure.

I hate that we have to sit and wait for him to actually hurt a child before he can be prosecuted.

It's only a matter of time before some crazed parent beats this guy to death.

2007-07-31 04:29:27 · answer #4 · answered by BAnne 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers