Stop playing into his hands and doing what he wants. He recruits people by telling them that the West wants to destroy Islam by invading their sovereign nations with no provocation. We went ahead and did that in Iraq. If we get the hell out and actually do something to secure the " homeland" by actually securing our own borders, he will have no cannon fodder to use for recruitment and he would come out just to stir up some trouble. Then you nail the SOB
2007-07-31 04:29:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by thequeenreigns 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
The true enemy is within, it's socialists and communists who call themselves liberals and progressives.
It's the pople who want bad things to happen to the US, if the blame can be pointed at political opponents. It's those that take the terrorists view and try to tell you that the US deserved 911 and that political opponents helped perform the attacks. It's those that shriek about Haliburton, Cheney and oil- the shriekers are communsts and socialists.
We can't get Bin Laden because the global brotherhood of socialists and America Haters, would scream bloody hell, if we sent military into Pakistan to root out the liberals icon.
2007-08-01 20:05:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
When the intelligence services that created Bin Laden in the 80's doesn't need him anymore he will be assassinated or he will commit "suicide" in the name of the Prophet. He is a scare-crow used to distract the masses from the real war that is taking place all over the world.
I feel pity for those that mistakenly took him for a guru or a idol of the fight against a denatured system of governance, because he is not a real "Muslim" and he is also a fake demon.
Maybe the best way of making him surface would be to force the secret services to do the job that the population, not the politicians, need them to do.
2007-07-31 11:46:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by (ro)Bulldog 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you flush out Bin Laden then you have to capture him.
If you capture him, the nit-wit democrats will declare the war on terror over and cut off funds to the military.
Bill Clinton declared victory when he realized a budget surplus by cutting the military by 50%. Like little Jack Horner, he stuck in his thumb and pulled out a plumb. The surplus lasted one year, 1996 and he's been talking about it ever since.
The truth of history is, that whenever the US cuts it's military, it gets attacked and we end up spending 400% more than what we would have if maintain at a deterrent level.
So, it's actually more cost efficient to leave Osama right where he is, where ever that might be.
2007-07-31 11:32:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Give me one reason, the Pentagon wants Bin Laden caught! That guy single handed, increased Military spending in the USA from 250 billion to 1 Trillion a year, fighting a couple of ghosts with box cutters. The generals and contractors have never been so fat and happy!
2007-07-31 11:35:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Elect Hillary. He will probably come strolling through Central Park since he will have no fear of the United States government of military.
2007-07-31 11:32:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Dress up some special forces dudes to look like an Al-Jazera camera crew.
2007-07-31 11:28:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Abandon Bush in the Afghani desert
2007-07-31 11:27:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Advidoct 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
I take it you are talking of Osama, he has several brothers and they all are 'Bin Laden'.
Convey the message to him that he is needed to play his own role in a Hollywood movie and shooting will be in White House!
2007-07-31 11:32:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by aWellWisher 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
A dialysis machine set in front of his cave?
2007-08-03 15:51:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by egg_sammash 5
·
0⤊
0⤋