English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I do!!! I think Herbert Hoover did a better job then he is!

2007-07-31 02:38:14 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

33 answers

No, I think he is just a pawn of evil, like Cheney, Rumsfeld, et.al.

2007-07-31 02:41:23 · answer #1 · answered by mommanuke 7 · 4 4

Just WHAT makes YOU an expert in anything? You have a vague Bush-bash here with no specifics, no logic, no nothing! If you would learn to read, and then read unrevised history, you would find that Hebert Hoover was a great logistician, and that Harry Truman put him in charge of saving Europe from famine right after World War Two. Hebert Hoover did an exemplary job at that. As for his presidency, it is generally acknowledged by agenda-neutral scholars that he was caught up in accidents of history, he was actually a good president but was caught up in an economic mess not of his making. Like with with the present president. Dont know what your problem with him is, but I am sure you would never be able to do a better job. Neither would any of the Clintonistas or any of the clowns in that circus on the left.

2007-07-31 02:55:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

George Bush is 'evil' in the sense that he's a willing stooge for some truely nasty people. By now he must realize just what a whore he's been for the Oil Mafia, the corporations in general and the Jesus freak right. Right after 9/11 he had his chance to be a truely great man...he could have risen far above the 'old George Bush' and earned the legacy he wants. Instead he listened the likes of Rove and Cheney and led the US into debt and dishonor. George Bush doesn't rise to the level of 'evil'....he's just an empty suit...a pitiful nothing...a tool!

2007-07-31 02:54:29 · answer #3 · answered by Noah H 7 · 1 1

Dez604 is an idiot.

Clinton actually did more to combat terrorism than any president before him, and the republicans fought him every step of the way.

Bush has the blood of every one of our soldiers on his hands.

Is that evil?

Bush has betrayed his pledge to uphold and defend the constitution.

Is that evil?

Bush attacked a nation by cherry picking only the intelligence he wanted to justify this war.

Bush has spent more money than all other presidents combined!

We just had more soldiers killed in the last 12 months than at any other time of the war.

Every study says that Bush has increased the threat of terrorism and increased the likelihood of attack on the U.S.

The republicans voted down a bill that would've outlawed war profiteering.

Meanwhile, corporations make billions in profits at the expense of our soldiers.

Is that evil?

Bush has lied to us more times than can be mentioned here.

Is that evil?

2007-07-31 03:19:51 · answer #4 · answered by Stan 6 · 1 0

George Walker Bush is the Devil's Spawn on this earth. The Bush family sold their souls to the Devil when Prescott Bush chanelled money to help Adolf Hitler get his rise to power in Germany prior to the Second World War. The Bush Clan will all join together in the Anals of Hades upon their deaths as their souls belong to Lucifer.

2007-07-31 03:10:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No, I don't believe that he is evil.
You mean that Herbert Hoover did a better job of recovering from the depression he inherited from the previous president? Hoover didn't have 9/11 to deal with during the same time, or a war.

2007-07-31 02:43:18 · answer #6 · answered by sparky_coffee 3 · 3 3

First, I in basic terms prefer to assert that i've got suggested you for insulting blondebeauty. you are the guy who asked for evaluations. in basic terms because of the fact somebody else's opinion isn't the comparable as yours would not recommend they are incorrect. Your remark shows how immature you're. 2nd, she is sturdy. George Bush is premier the rustic as maximum suitable as he can. The unhappiness of the rustic isn't his fault. human beings are in charge for their own strikes and inactions, so which you will no longer blame that on Bush in basic terms because of the fact he's a convienient objective. Bush is attempting to do what's sturdy. regardless of what you notice interior the information or choose for to hearken to, they are doing sturdy issues over in Iraq. How do i be responsive to for a actuality? because of the fact my cousin is over there staggering now and retains me as much as date. confident, there are deaths. those squaddies chosen to pass to the army. they chosen to maintain on with orders and pass. It replaced into THEIR decision. So provide up blaming Bush for all the subject concerns interior the international. confident, i'm a Christian, and that i do help Bush. You asked for persons's evaluations on no count number if Bush is "evil" or no longer, then while somebody provides an answer you do in contrast to, you insult them? you're a very immature individual, and immature human beings annoy the heck out of me. it is in all risk why I suggested you. Have a extreme-high quality day.

2016-12-11 05:51:54 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I dont know about Herbert Hoover. but acc. to me Bush is not Evil. He does everything for the sake of his country's reputation n his countrymen.

2007-07-31 02:42:53 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

Evil? No. Misguided? Yes.

2007-07-31 04:13:26 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0 0

Evil? No, Hitler was evil. Bush is actually TRYING to do the right thing. To actually believe he is "evil" is ignorant.

2007-07-31 03:05:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes you r correct, b cos he don't know about the value of the human life.

2007-07-31 19:50:35 · answer #11 · answered by pradeep_spc 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers