MLB turned a blind eye to steriods in baseball, because it was losing a fan base, and people like power hitting. Even though the use of steriods without a perscription is/was a federal crime MLB did nothing about it until Congress threatened involvement.
Granted the NFL has more than its share of dopers, and has even graver off the field issues with many of its players. The difference between the MLB and NFL is that the NFL is doing something about its off-field problems; Vick has yet to be convicted, which is the argument used to justify not suspending Barry.
The NBA has more off-field problems per player than does MLB. MLB has more players, as does the NFL, which causes problems to seem more common simply do to larger numbers.
International Cycling is perhaps the biggest assortment of dopers in any sports league there is.
I even remember in high school a lot of players using different drugs, all of them legal to buy, which can lower heart rates and relax muscles in order to make you run better. I called out a couple guys on my own squad and told them they were cheaters, but what they did was their business, no laws were broken when they tried for unnatural advantages. Doping occurs in a vast array of forms at nearly every level of competition, solely blaming MLB is a slightly skewed look at the world.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
If anyone out there is ignorant enough to say Bond's never used steroids, and/or there is no proof, please, read these articles.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1937594
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2358236
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=2435256
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/news/story?id=2389940
http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/news?slug=txbondsshadows&prov=st&type=lgns
(you will notice Bonds didn't sue for libel, curious)
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=2948210
Simply use common sense and a basic grasp of logic and you can come to a few conclusions. You heard a veiled confession come right from Bonds.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
And about Lance Armstrong...
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/cycling/2006-06-01-l-equipe-lance-doping_x.htm?POE=SPOISVA
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/cycling/tourdefrance/2005-08-29-tour-drug-investigation_x.htm?POE=SPOISVA
http://www.azcentral.com/sports/azetc/articles/0531armstrong-doping-ON.html
(notice that the newspaper's story was never actually refuted, but only the conduct was questioned.)
2007-07-31 03:12:05
·
answer #1
·
answered by 29 characters to work with...... 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Problem is: Is there any irrefutable proof that Bonds took drugs to enhance his performance? I hear about all the other athletes coming up hot on their tests and then they are banned for a certain period of games. Did Bonds every test positive? I've heard all about how other people are saying he did but that's just someones word against his. Has Bonds come up on any tests recently? Nope, but he continues to hit the home runs. Now, I'm not ruling out the possibility but if there isn't any proof how can you persecute him?
It's hard to say that any sport still has their integrity still intact. Everyone of them has had some type of scandal that puts them into the spotlight. Vick's recent activities has brought the NFL to the limelight and what they are going to do with him. Right now he has only been banned from training camp. What about the season? Endorsements deals have gone out the window. Upper Deck has pulled all of Vick's cards from their products, but there is still a possibility of Vick playing in the season (although it being a small one).
Everything isn't perfect in the world and sometimes you can get away with bending the rules.
2007-07-31 02:05:22
·
answer #2
·
answered by mpjedi520 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The reason why baseball is a joke starts right at the top. When baseball was almost dead, everyone turned thier heads on Sosa and McGuire juicing because their little home run derby was needed to put fans back in the seats.
As to wether Bonds cheated: he's never tested dirty. Anyway, steroids don't give you some kind of instant super power, you have to be a pretty good hitter in the first place. It's more about eye-hand coordination and bat speed than brute power.
2007-07-31 01:57:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by kianvis 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The reason Rose was banned for life is because he bet on baseball, which was against the rules. Prior to it happening, they didn't have a rule about steroids (even though it was illegal through law) and the other posters are right, he never did test positive even though his own testimony says he admitted to it.
But Yay to the NFL, what a wholesome league.
Exactly how many players (millionaires yet) have attempted or committed murder? You have people dying in practice from heart attacks related to stimulents and drugs.
Let's not forget that half the reason NFL exists is for gamblers. It wouldn't have half the following it does without vegas. (and people complain about the role of a 'closer', but no one complains about the guy whose sole job is on the defence, on short yards on 3 or 4th down. Now, that's a specialist)
NBA. Now that Toronto has a franchise, they actually have to tell the Toronto players that they aren't allowed to bring up and carry weapons in their cars. Every new player that joins the team, they have to explicitly say "Canada has tight gun controls, you can't carry them on your person, in your vehicle, etc"
You have Kobe accused of rape, gangster franchise players carrying weapons and now the ref fixing games.
The only league more clean than MLB is the NHL.
2007-07-31 02:13:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by brettj666 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Your question is based on a fallacy, it is not OK to take drugs in MLB. Those that do face major suspension time and can be banned from the game if caught too many times. The other problem with your statement is the Bonds is cheating, and there has never been and evidence provided by anyone to support your statement. You have come to an inaccurate conclusion based on inaccurate supporting statements.
2007-07-31 02:12:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Frizzer 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't start throwing stones... MLB is right now considered the league with the LEAST amount of problems. Yes, steroids have become a big issue. But, baseball doesn't have a star player that has been indicted for dog fighting AND they don't have an official that has been investigated by the FBI for betting on games that he worked!
As for Mark McGwire, he has never been mentioned in the steroid circles. Yes, he was a huge man in 1998, but, he was chosen by the government to speak to Congress because Sammy Sosa and himself were considered the biggest stars of the game AT THE TIME. Since his retirement, McGwire has lived a private life with his family.
As for your comment about ethics, I wouldn't exactly tout the NFL as the model league. They have their problems. Yes, Roger Goodell has done a wonderful job in controlling the players. However, the manner of the NFL and MLB are completely different. Many people watch NFL games to see large men beat the crap out of eachother. Others watch MLB games for strategy; skinny guys can contribute as much to a team as large, muscular guys.
You may not agree with my opinion, but I think that my answer is as unbiased as it can be.
2007-07-31 01:51:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by T-Ball 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
The MLB Players Union is too strong. They get guaranteed contracts which is good for the players bank account but save a few does not provide a lot of incentive to play that hard. TheUnion has walked all over Selig for years and will continue to do so unless the Fed can do something. Sad situation though.
2007-07-31 02:44:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Listen buddy, I agree with you to an extent on some of this stuff, but lets break it down. Did Bonds and McGwire take steroids? Yeah, they probably did. Did they ever get caught? No, thats where the difference lies. Pete Rose was caught gambling, as were the 1919 White Sox. You cant be punished if not caught.
2007-07-31 01:54:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by J-Far 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Q: what's the suited weight for a criminal professional? A: Ten pounds - yet that contains the urn. lol the only above is fairly large! George and Lenny settle directly to bypass North usa in a warm air balloon. although, neither have been extremely experienced balloonists, and Lenny's recommendations at as quickly as drifted from navigation to recommendations of ways clouds look like cuddly little bunny rabbits. Upon understanding that they've been misplaced, George declared, "Lenny -- we can could desire to lose some altitude so that it is going to ensure the place we are." George shall we some warm air out of the balloon, which slowly descended under the clouds, yet he nonetheless could no longer tell the place they have been. a techniques under, they could see a guy on the floor. George diminished the balloon, to ask the guy their region. whilst they have been low adequate, George stated as all the way down to the guy, "whats up, are you able to let us know the place we are?" the guy on the floor yelled back, "you're in a balloon, approximately one hundred ft up in the air." George stated as all the way down to the guy, "you're able to be a criminal professional." "Gee, George," Lenny spoke back, "how are you able to tell?" George spoke back, "because of the fact the advice he gave us is one hundred% precise, and is thoroughly ineffective". the guy stated as back as much as the balloon, "you're able to be a shopper." George yelled back, "Why do you're saying that?" "nicely," the guy spoke back, "you do no longer understand the place you're, or the place you're going. you acquire into your dilemma by using a loss of making plans, and could have prevented it by using inquiring for help in the previous you acted. you assume me to furnish an instantaneous therapy. in actuality you're in the right same place you have been in in the previous we met, yet now that's a approach or the different my fault." Does this have something to do with he e book Of Mice and adult males?!? (like the characters!)
2016-10-08 21:38:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, it's sad. Breaking classic records through drug enhancement isn't really impressive or even respectable. They need to be more consistent with their rules.
2007-07-31 01:45:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Kami 4
·
0⤊
0⤋