No disrespect to Heather, but it does you make you think if they are suffering trade because of the McCann's actions by leaving the kids alone that night!
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AmxEXDHlnIJYq9TC5d3zSdAtLxV.?qid=20070731024925AAIa0mx
2007-07-30 23:30:57 · 12 answers · asked by Welshchick 7 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
No, that would finish them. The ultimate responsibility for a child's safety belongs with the parents, so Mark Warner have no reason to sue.
I would think, though, that the continued presence of the McCanns, Press, Police etc can hardly be of much benefit to the tourist trade in general in Praia de Luz.
2007-07-31 08:04:47 · answer #1 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
" I am convinced that the Resort security was weak - not enough guards, not enough cameras etc.
Therefore the McCanns should sue the resort"
D'oh! Blame culture again. The McCanns left their children unsupervised. Therefore, they have to deal with the consequences (not that I'd wish this on anyone). Anyone seeking to blame the resort is like being hit by a car whilst jaywalking and seeking to blame the council for not putting a crossing just where you wanted to cross.
2007-07-31 00:11:46 · answer #2 · answered by Andrew R 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Mark Warners always warn Holiday Makers not to leave their Children unattended ,I think Mark Warners need to re-think their policies towards the services offered for the care of children.It needs up-dating to foil kidnappers.They don't even own the holiday complex ,they are agents for the privately owned apartments.They supported The McCanns ,so I doubt if they will.Perhaps with hindsight they should send The McCanns a bill ,its all tax deductable.
2007-07-31 00:05:37 · answer #3 · answered by Lindsay Jane 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
That is a very good question and Jack H made some very good points. I do agree with both of you. Everyone will now associate that resort with the McCann saga so they will lose out.
2007-07-30 23:41:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
"Many holidaymakers felt that, in spite of the reality that the motel replaced into open to the village, it replaced into nonetheless risk-free and maintain. In early could, it replaced into nonetheless very quiet, extra beneficial than a month till now the holiday season gets into complete swing. Gerry McCann has reported he never observed a soul, different than as quickly as, on the final evening, on his evening assessments going to and fro between the eating place and the apartment – a stroll of a few minute. because of the fact the McCanns without end repeated afterwards, in the event that they had thought it replaced into incorrect or maybe risky, they could never have left their toddlers." Wow, many things to be surprised of... In first place "it replaced into nonetheless risk-free and maintain" so as this is why they left the apartment thoroughly unlocked...? 2nd, what a twist of fate (dazzling) Gerry never seen a soul yet on the final evening... wow it replaced into an abducter, do no longer think of so. third, with the lack of ability of rapid athletes for the Olympics from the British team, why they did no longer ask Gerry to pass and beat Carl Lewis checklist...? If he can stroll the area in 1minute I inform you even a formulation One automobile could conflict to be swifter. final yet no longer the record, they did no longer think of it replaced into incorrect to depart 3 toddlers on their own in an unlocked apartment, while all and sundry knows that youngsters could desire to wreck themselves by using twist of destiny, or maybe one yet another, no longer risky, of direction no longer, this is why they never wrote baby NEGLECTING regulations. McJeckyll & McHyde are extraordinary on their own style, the unusual definition i be responsive to it style of feels "regularly occurring" to me comparing with all this... Edit: Izo, this is in basic terms organic isn't it? To think of we could desire to constantly shield our toddlers and not be selfish with our life style, sturdy to be certain you.
2016-12-11 05:47:15 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they left the children unsupervised alone, that why unsafe leave them unsupervised without adult present there? no u can't sue the family for their responsibility of their children, alot of kids get kidnapping or sold them to slave?? it hard to be family times.
2007-07-31 06:52:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
good idea, but mark warners have enough negative publicity due to this child neglect at the moment
2007-07-30 23:46:22 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
they must be suffering trade as we were going to portugal this year for 2 weeks now were going somewhere else instead
2007-07-30 23:42:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
good point, their neglet for their child could ruin Mark warner.
2007-07-31 00:16:16 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I would far rather they sued the person who took the child.
2007-07-30 23:55:39 · answer #10 · answered by True Blue Brit 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋