...6 or 7? Or is 5 enough?
2007-07-30 20:17:46 · 33 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
EIGHT!
Then you don't have to pay income taxes!
So uh, me and you, you wanna?
2007-07-30 20:20:53 · answer #1 · answered by Frannie 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why stop there? Go for broke and make a small army of stupids. 20 or so should do nicely, though you'll need a small harem of proper hos to quicken the process.
Then you can take over the government on the "vote for stupid" ticket and win (you know you'll win).
Once you do, you can start your plan for world domination that has hiterto gone unfulfilled by the millions of hapless saps just like you who yet lacked the proper focus to continue ignorantly churning out child after stupid child, until the army was complete.
Do it; be a leader. Do it for your country. We're counting on you.
Besides, if you lose... you can always start a telemarketing firm.
2007-07-30 20:24:25 · answer #2 · answered by p37ry 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I live paycheck to paycheck and no party at all still get the answer for 0. For your case, supposed to be negative numbers. That mean you supposed to be back in your mother's tummy
2007-07-30 21:16:47 · answer #3 · answered by Khanh D 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if your irresponsible you prolly don't need to have children but i think that 4 or less is good enough not 6 or 7
2007-07-30 20:20:19 · answer #4 · answered by b_nikki 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Six at the least. You are the perfect candidate for fatherhood.
When my daughter was born, only one thought entered my mind. The idea the I am responsible for the up bring of another human being is totally ridiculous.
2007-08-01 02:27:34 · answer #5 · answered by SunnyMoon 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you're that totally irresponsible, I don't see any reason why you should be bothered on how many children you should have. You wouldn't give a damn, would you? You're irresponsible!
2007-07-30 20:27:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well if your gonna be drunk all the time your going to need a pimp cane 12 kids, a wife, a girl on the side, and a drinking buddy (lawn gnome)
2007-07-30 20:20:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why not just practice having 2 to 3 every day. Sound like fun?
2007-07-30 20:53:11 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
With the lifestyle you just wrote of I hope you don't have any kids. Children are a major responsibility. They take a lot of time and a crap load of cash.
bottom line.
I don't think you can handle kids.
2007-07-30 20:21:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The government will only pay for the first four children.
2007-07-30 21:20:56 · answer #10 · answered by FawneMine 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
.5
2007-07-30 20:19:24 · answer #11 · answered by curiosityreincarnated 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋