On 9/11, would you have stood by and did nothing like bush did or would you have had the planes shot down?

Question

IF I'm "misinformed" then enlighten me, just what DID bush DO on 9/11?

Experts anticipated terrorists using planes as far back as 1993, why didn't bush?

http://cooperativeresearch.org/entity.jsp?entity=world_trade_center

kerry was at the helm on 9/11?

Answer 1

People who refuse to accept the fact that the U.S. Government had their hand in the Terror Attacks of 911 are ignorant. It's impossible for Jet fuel or Kerosene to melt iron. Also if the floors collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Some will argue that the fires were raging hot inferno’s...however if that was the case then why were there people standing in the holes where the planes impacted waving for help? Their clothes weren’t even burnt.

Here we are talking about the biggest crime scene in the history of the United States...and what did Guilani do? He scooped up all the evidence and got rid of it as fast as he possibly could. Sent overseas to be recycled? I doubt it...my guess is they dumped it all in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.

If people would for one second look at the evidence...it's a common tactic for a country to injure or attack itself and then blame it on the enemy. Then we can go get em. There is even a name for it...it’s called.. “Pretext for Military Intervention” Why doesn’t someone tell me why NORAD didn't scramble any fighters to escort the hijacked planes down? They didn't miss 1, but all 4!! Anytime a commercial airline goes off course without explanation, within 10 minutes, fighter jets are supposed to escort them down. Especially the air space over the Pentagon! Hmmm. How convenient. You think it was because Bush ordered Cheney to take control over NORAD the same morning of the attacks? Did you also know that the WTC changed owners about six months prior to the attacks? Did you know that the buildings were worth more if destroyed than standing? That Larry Silverstein is the man who cashed out on the scam...walking away with billions? Did you know that there was a flurry of activity on Wall Street prior to the attacks, and the majority of the trading was “Put options” on the doomed Airlines stock? Did you know that there were multiple explosions heard inside the buildings from all kinds of firefighters, police officers and witnesses? Did you know that WTC Building 7 fell at approximately 5:30 p.m.? That the building did not suffer any major damage, but it somehow blew up into a fine pile of dust? Does anyone know what propaganda is? Do you know that it is also a well known and effectively used tool for the government to pull the wool over your eyes? Well, don't say we didn't warn you when your asking yourself 5 years from now "How could this happen?" Educate yourself and open your eyes folks. This is real, and there are more than just a couple of us who think so. Go to Google and type in..911 inside job...have yourself a look at all the choices there are to choose from.

Answer 2

I was far away so I couldn't do any thing but you are wrong my friend when you say that Bush didn't do any thing on 9/11. The reports and analysis confirm that it is Bush who did all this.
In the presence of a very very strong American security system and most modern and active inteligence agencies it is hard to believe that anyone else could do this instead of Bush & Co.
The way the Building colapsed right on its base/knees it looks that it was demolished by the experts so that buildings around should not be demaged.
Then it can not be coincident that all the jews working in that building were on leave that day.
There are several other witnesses to prove that it was planned by Bush & Co.
It gives strength to our doubts when Bush told the nation that Iraq has links with Al Qaeda and admitted later that they could not find any proof of linkage between Saddam and Al Qaeda.
Bush is infact a name of mentality and, In my opinion, this the right time for Americans to get rid of it. They should press their government to let UNO play its role because an action taken by USA instead of UNO will lead to hate against Americans and this will threaten their peace and peace of the whole world.

Answer 3

I'm only responding to the young lady who believes that fuel and fire cannot melt iron.

Question #1: How do you think Iron/steel beams are formed? They are heated and tempered. I don't know of any iron/steel beam trees.

Question #2: Are you really so naive as to believe that the fire had to melt the iron/steel? Couldn't have just gotten it hot enough to weaken it making it plyable? Iron that can bend will buckle under 20,000+ tons of pressure!

Question #3: Did you not notice people who were more willing to jump to their deaths then sit there and burn to death?

Question #4: What moron told you that it would take a building 90 seconds to collapse on itself? That would have the building collapsing at a speed of around 12 mph.
Do you know how slow that is?

You obviously have no clue on anything and spend to much time in back rooms with your conspiracy theorist buddies. Get an education and then come back with an argument that can at least stand without your ignorance there trying to hold it up.

Answer 4

The explosive capacity and the form wherein the Pentagon grew to become into broken grew to become into brought about by using jet gasoline and many it. this is no longer achieveable, no longer even in ones wildest mind's eye, for a missile to hold adequate gasoline to do the wear and tear that grew to become into accomplished on the Pentagon. additionally, all different explosives with the equivalent capacity of the Pentagon 9/eleven incident might have left a lots diverse harm footprint that must be fairly recognizable. the wear and tear accomplished to the Pentagon grew to become into maximum truthfully the effect off an pretty great plane flying into it.

Answer 5

I hear this question more and more these days, because people are forgetting what it was like on 9/11. I remember a friend running up to me and telling me the WTC was 'under attack', I asked him how big the bomb was. THAT was the reaction of most people on that day. Before 9/11 who could have conceived of planes full of people being used as offensive weapons? Every time before they would just hijack the plane and take it somewhere, either releasing the hostages or asking for ransom. There was no reason to believe they needed to be shot down at all until after the events of that day.

Answer 6

Most respondents seem to concern themselves with only 'the event'. Yes, it was horrific, it was designed to be! If something is horrific enough then the people will believe 'anything' that they are told. I watched it on English TV, as it happened. Within twenty minutes they knew who'd done it, why they'd done it, where they were, who was on the planes, everything! I remember thinking: how the hell do they know that! England has a long history of terrorist acts, and even our media never knew anything in such a short period of time. The only way they could have known so much was if they knew it was going to happen! If they knew it was going to happen,why did they let it happen. Perhaps his response was the one thing that he hadn't practised. Or perhaps, as many many people are beginning to suspect, it WAS an inside job. You have as many children as you can mate. This planet 'needs' people who ask questions like this. I would suspect that the media are probably not in on it.

Answer 7

Most of these answers are correct.

BUT. To go along with the 911 conspiracies, and this is a fact, NORAD was conducting live fighter tests that day. One of these drills included passenger planes being flown into the towers. What a coincidence huh? The recording of the NORAD flight controller is online somewhere and he's asking his superior if the incoming blip on his radar was real or a drill. Commander told him to stand down.

Hmmmmmm.


Dekardkain, do some research man.

Answer 8

I don't get why the planes could have been off course for so long with no interceptors sent up; and I don't get why the grounding of all flights had to initiate with air traffic controllers and not from any sort of national security initiative.

And I am not subscribing to any conspiracy theory here, just commenting that the goverment was totally unprepared and incompetent to handle the situation.

Answer 9

If the attack was discovered in 1993, why didnt CLINTON do anything about it. Bush did do something, by bombing the living **** out of al qaeda in Afghanistan, invading Iraq, attack insurgencies in the Phillipines, etc. How easy would it be for you to shoot down a plane full of innocent civilians without knowing what the terrorist's intent was?

Answer 10

Well, I guess you could just take it all in and order the murder of hundreds of innocent people on those planes. Listen to John Kerry did we.

The fact of the matter my misinformed friend is that thirty minutes after 9/11 we had fighter jets in the air and ready to shoot down any other hijacked aircraft. In fact Bush gave the order to fire on any hijacked aircraft 4 minutes before the last nplane crashed in Pennsylvania, its just military commanders didn't pass the order fearing a accident.

So does that help, hope so. Oh and by the way, your liberal friend John Kerry sat in his offcie for more then thirty minutes after hearing of the attack.