Tell me the consequences we would have faced, as a nation, if the war had never begun?

Question

I don't want to hear we would have saved alot money.
I want to read about the postives that have come out of all of it, and I want those who are against the war to realize that Hillary Clintions vote was not in vain, neither is, and was the war itself.

Your made your point. The only thing you forgot to mention is Osama Bin Ladin's capture, and death, which only occurred due to the war.
If Osama had not been captured, AL-qadea would have planned more terrorists scenarios like 9-11, and we would be dealing with a stronger nuisance in the future.:P
This nuiscance, if the war had not begun would also have had open doors to NWH's, which would have not lead a promising outcome.
So instead of losing the earth, by nuclear emmisions, we stablized peace by sacarficing military lifes. These honored, but lost soliders fought not for themselves, or for bush, but for the safety of a nation, and the safety of the entire planet.
I then feel obligated to believe, that Hillary Clintion saying she "WISHES SHE NEVER VOTED" is a fallacy, because she did vote for all the right reason.
Now, since Al-Qadea is weaken, and the servent of the hostile God are turning to peace, we should flea from the country only when we know for fact, that this nation...

as all others, (UNs job) are protected, and do not have to fear of new terriost attacks.
I believe that if we just leave, today, in several years, we will just have to go through the same thing over again, when the power of Al-Qadea becomes rehabiliated.

Answer 1

If the war with Iraq had never begun- 3,000+ American soldiers (+ x # of allied troops) would still be alive today- & 10,000 MORE would not be dealing with life altering war wounds. (Sadam could've and WOULD'VE eventually been killed- by a well "placed" missile... Going in to "get him" with troops- was NEVER a "necessity). Our standing in the World as a "Positive, Powerful Nation" might STILL be intact, had we not made FOOLS of ourselves by insisting that Iraq was a danger to us. Al-Queda would've had one LESS "recruiting center" for obtaining money (from corrupt Iraqi officials), arms & fresh terrorist reinforcements- to send out into the World & haunt US- elsewhere... And Iran wouldn't have been able to take over the amount of Influence it currently now has in the Middle East- because of the Power Vaccuum WE created in Iraq- when we helped install the current weak Iraqi government.... .... ... A LOT of intellegent Americans made a MISTAKE when they backed Bush's war in Iraq.... -And Hillary Clinton was one of them. Still, with SO MANY such people having made the SAME mistake, and still "come around" to realising it SINCE, one has to give them a LITTLE "credit"- for being human.... I intend to vote for Hillary Clinton next year- inspite of her vote to approve the war. But I still STRONGLY BELIEVE- that the war was WRONG, unjustified, and a complete WASTE... And that we will CONTINUE to "pay" for this MISTAKE- for years far into the future... :(

Answer 2

Oh you want positives '''OK once upon a time there was a bad man but he rose to power because other bad men although not as bad, helped him these not so bad men were called the CIA and others then in the 1980' a man named Donnie Rumsfeld came to visit the bad man and offered him the means to make poison gas while Donnie was Special envoy to the Mid East for weapons proliferation under a guy named Ron, who while selling Missiles to Iran also sold weapons to the Bad man who was Iran's enemy. Sorry I don't have any fairy tales to tell you. You seem to really want one.

Answer 3

If you are speaking of the war in Iraq, YOU name the positives, because I cannot think of any. It had nothing to do with WMD's, or terrorism (It does now)! The middle east has been at war with each other for centuries, we will accomplish nothing long term by being there.

Answer 4

How about precious human lives wasted. Shove your politics far up your rectum until what you want to hear raises the dead. You won't comfort one mother who lost a child in Iraq, or any other war, even though you were born, from a mother and she had better intentions for you.
The Clintons had us in less covered wars as well.
Just because it is foreigners clinging to body parts of their children, doesn't make war o.k., or less inhumane.

Answer 5

Well it did begin, as for back as 1998, and if we had not taken action against them, many more major cities would have been attacked already, and maybe millions of our own citizens would be dead. Hillary has been that way all her life, even since college, she has not changed since them. Yes, she voted for the war like hundreds of others did, and no, it was not in vain. Depends on which crowd she is talking to even now, she may say she is for the war, and the other crowd use excuses of why she did. She is so pathetic.

Answer 6

Which war? We're involved in two, and they are not the same war.

Answer 7

exxon and saudi profits would have been less. haliburton would have not profitted outrageously. gas would be about $2.00/gal. fewer people in the world would be anti-usa terrorist supporters.

Answer 8

Than why do you even bother to ask the question if you are telling us how you want us to answer??

*Irritated*