None of them are willing to answer questions in a live debate. Are they really afraid of talking off script and hearing from the constituents? What gives?
2007-07-30 18:22:27 · 15 answers · asked by Danielmcfate 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I was referring to the You tube 'debate', which while having a few oddballs was at least an unscripted conversation. Emotional or not and wackos or no, those are the voters.
2007-08-01 19:26:32 · update #1
Because if they answer the questions, you will know that all they want are slaves to do their will.
But then that is my personal opinion.
2007-07-30 22:29:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
i don't think of they're afraid. they does not % to make the attempt while they're in a position to get an even bigger aim industry on television or in a public section as additionally they gets press there. The schedules for the front runners are very tight. A video may well be detracting from precious time someplace else, the place questions may well be asked on an even bigger scale. I consider White Feather on the viability
2016-10-13 04:29:52 · answer #2 · answered by reardigan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The YouTube debate was a bigger joke than the previous debates. The questions were emotional personal sob stories instead issues that influence the population as a whole.
We should not be governed by such emotional nonsense, but cold rational examination of the facts. The YouTube debate concept is symbolic of the feelings first culture.
2007-07-30 18:32:44 · answer #3 · answered by The Stylish One 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
If your talking about the next youtube debate(and I use that term lightly), I thought the Dem one was pretty lame...stupid questions and Kuccinich (sp?) trying to get people to text for peace..wha?
I suspect the Repub one would be just as lame and lack just as much substance as the Dem one did!!
BTW, there are too many candidates for a real debate...all any of them do is offer lip service and not much more; hell, they don't have the time to!!
2007-07-30 18:29:38 · answer #4 · answered by iroteb 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
i think the republican got everything twisted Giuliani probably the worst mayor NYC ever had and his a leading candidate his a guy that divided NYC and the guy really not a great leader but i guess if Bush won a general election why not Giuliani.
2007-07-30 18:30:20 · answer #5 · answered by clyde 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Same reason the left was scared to go to the debates scheduled on Fox news. They don't want their polar opposites in charge of the questions. And I can't blame the Dems on the Fox debates and I can't blame the Reps on the Youtube debates.
2007-07-30 18:27:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
wow, a lot of bitter, lazy people on here today. Hey at least the stamps are out next week.
2007-07-31 07:08:35 · answer #7 · answered by Corruptfile34 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Republicans have poor stands on issues that is currently besetting the country. Thus, they are afraid of giving reals answers in a debate.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if the Republicans will likely win.
2007-07-30 18:27:57 · answer #8 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2⤊ 6⤋
should they say "our party really sold you out for exxon and the saudis, four more years, four more years."
it's over hillary won.
2007-07-30 18:54:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
the last one was just for show I knew someone will do this there not scared they just want real questions not just questions from a snow man or a guy who thanks his gun is his baby.
2007-07-30 18:30:11 · answer #10 · answered by Jeremy P 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋