2007-07-30 18:06:37 · 8 answers · asked by Jay D 2 in Sports ➔ Baseball
yes, I think Galvine will be the last 300 game winner for a long time. Others have said that Johnson will make it, which I don't see happening he just went on the shelf for the rest of year with a bad back, which has put him on the dl 2 other times this year. Smoltz is pushing 40, he prob woul've made it if he didn't make the switch to closing. Pedro is old and having trouble staying heathy. Mussina has pretty much said he doesn't see himself pitching long enough to get to 300.
2007-07-30 20:06:43 · answer #1 · answered by deadhead (Who Dat Nation) 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't agree with you, Im going to the game tomorrow to see history in the making, Tom Glavines 300th win. I looked this up, Currently Randy Johnson has 284, only needing 16 to reach 300, he can easily reach this. Also we have Mike Mussina with 244, thats 56 away. David Wells is up with Mussina at 234, but hes getting old at the age of 44. Other than those 2 I think Pedro Martinez has a chance, he has 204 right now, only 35 years old and with a long chance Andy Pettite, who has 192. Those are your only active possibilites to reach 300.
2007-07-30 22:20:26 · answer #2 · answered by Tyler F 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
This may very well be the case. The only other pitcher that is close with 284 wins is Randy Johnson, but with his history of injury, it is unlikely that he will get there. He would probably need two seasons to do it.
2007-07-31 01:00:37 · answer #3 · answered by Dustin S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I can't say I agree, I am a Met fan, and I like Tom Glavine; but, in reality, I liked Tom Seaver better (311 wins).
2007-07-31 00:25:32 · answer #4 · answered by samdugan 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No.
Johnson will grind it out if at all possible.
Pedro, if he comes back strong, will make it.
And, at least 15 years hence, maybe longer, there will be another ace charging toward 300 who will make it. We don't know his name today, but history has a tendency to toss up one or two every generation, on average.
2007-07-30 18:12:06 · answer #5 · answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No-because (if) steriods are all out of baseball in the future, pitchers will have an easier chance of throwing better games-then leadd to more wins-then lead to 300 wins. its that simple.
2007-07-30 18:14:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
i dont know if anyone else does but i dont there will be some one else
2007-07-30 18:31:49 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, that's what they said about Clemmens and Maddux.
2007-07-30 18:10:15 · answer #8 · answered by Dodgerblue 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋