2007-07-30 17:29:48 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Ron Paul
2007-07-30 17:32:10 · answer #1 · answered by Rusty 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Even though he doesn't have a chance because of the current political entrenchment network, Ron Paul would definitely be the politician would would withdraw our troops, and stop funding, from and of the war in Iraq. I believe that some of these established politicians, including Paul, should spread their wings to test a third party candidacy of the Reform Party of Ross Perot. That way since they are well-established in most states, he wouldn't have to fight to get placed on state ballots. He could pick and choose his fights, and he would have a much greater influence on the race by pulling votes from both parties. It isn't a matter of "most likely" to withdraw troops, but "when", if he's elected.
2007-07-30 18:06:03 · answer #2 · answered by gone 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hard to say. He/she is probably still in high school since there will more than likely be a military presense of considerable size in Iraq for the next 20-30 years at least. Sure we may reduce troop levels, but you'll go throw at least a dozen or so yellow ribbon bumper stickers and 5 or 6 cars before the last US soldier comes home from Iraq.
2007-07-30 17:56:24 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Ron Paul
2007-07-30 17:58:24 · answer #4 · answered by Ben Has Questions 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
HIllary Clinton will withdraw the troops if she wins as President in 2008.
VOTE for your choice as US President on my 360 degrees blog and know if Clinton will likely win.
2007-07-30 19:04:53 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
None in the near future.. Texas Bush threw all ethics by invading and destroying Iraq 4 the weapons of mass destruction which TODAY has been proved as PACK OF LIES... The war was only 4 OIL, nothing but OIL... Human lives dignified by the LORD has been sacrificed 4 OIL.... Bush is badly stuck with no alternative, imagine his rating is as low as in the 20's......................
2007-07-30 17:41:35 · answer #6 · answered by Mirando M 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
This question should not be in this 'category'.
It should be in 'polls....' - etc., etc.
This is not 'politics', general or otherwise - It's a popularity contest for those who would try to upgrade 'fringe' candidates'(especially for president).
I yield to your right to be 'in' this category. I disagree vehemently with the concept.
It invites repub 'bile' about dem candidates(of which one WILL be president - probably Clinton), based on the fact that 'they' voted in favor of going into Iraq - A repub congress assured that anyway and Bush and his admin. lied through their teeth to boot.
I don't believe that your Q is sincere !! I believe that it is what I've described it to be and also use the 'right' to say it !!
2007-07-30 17:53:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Ralph Nader!
2007-07-30 22:39:30 · answer #8 · answered by Earl S 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Dennis Kucinich. That's been the centerpiece of his election campaign since he started running for president for the 2004 election. He's still running on that promise as far as I know.....
2007-07-30 17:40:21 · answer #9 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zB2rVSmS6xE
I'd go with the funkmaster.
2007-07-30 17:37:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋