I haven't seen people slam a guy like this, before his case even goes to court, since Michael Jackson or OJ Simpson. Of course they both got off. I wonder what will happen.
2007-07-30 17:08:30 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Yep. The modern form of a lynching.
2007-07-30 17:18:16 · answer #1 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Since Michael Vick is such a role model as a pro football player, I think it is wrong for the NFL to let him keep the job even if he isn't found guilty in court. For something so extreme to just be brushed over and paid no attention to, for the NFL to not take action is the same as them saying that they don't care that he did what he did. Because so many people look up to him, it is important that the NFL shows that even though he is famous, what he did was still wrong, and he should be punished.
2016-05-18 03:08:49 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, the media has already convicted him. It is kind of the same thing they did to that LaCross team. The only difference is that it really sounds like Vick is guilty. Some evidence there that the Justice Brothers can't talk away.
2007-07-30 17:26:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Who cares about public opinion? are you talking about the same public that didnt want a recount during the 1st bush term? I really try not to watch TV or read too much of the newspaper...the media predicts what most people in america think and they play right into it...
I hope micheal vick is found innocent but if not i will still support him. Just like the judge that gave paris 2 weeks and nicole richie 2 days i want vick to get 2 days.....because DUI putting peoples lives in danger is a whole lot worse than putting animals in danger in my eyes
2007-07-30 17:19:54 · answer #4 · answered by evamercy7 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It's crazy how the media tries to extend judicial rules to even public discussions now. An attempt to apply legalese standards to all aspects of life. In law, a person is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. In normal people's lives, that isn't the case. If my neighbor Joe comes up and punches me in the nose, I'm not going to tell everybody that it didn't happen because it hasn't been proven in a court of law. And until it has been proven, I should keep my mouth shut. Law is one thing. Common sense is something else.
(and O.J. DID kill Nicole)
2007-07-30 17:23:49 · answer #5 · answered by nileslad 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The big difference with the O.J. and Michael Weird cases and this one is that this is Federal. With a conviction rate of over 98% and the FBI doing the investigation, not local prosecutors, my money with the Feds. I hope that the scumbag and his worthless cohorts serve their time in the worst hell hole of a prison. They all should rot in hell.
2007-08-01 11:16:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He was providing a valuable service to us Americans.....pitbulls suck, anyway.....they should all be destroyed. They are tying up our court system. GOD BLESS MIKE VICK. ANd how about all the dishonest and illegal things that are done in Washingtom. Why should Vick be chastised, while Mark Foley roams free?
The people doing the slamming all have Herpes 2.
2007-07-30 17:15:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I dont know, if he is really guilty of dogfighting he should fight a pitbull when convicted. Its up to a jury of 12 people to decide that, the press doesnt tell me he is guilty.
2007-07-30 17:17:55 · answer #8 · answered by alfie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He will be convicted and will serve time. He broke the law and there are now five witnesses who are willing to testify against him. One of these witnesses was his partner in crime. His sentence? I would put him into a kennel with ten Pit Bulls and let them tear him to pieces.
2007-07-30 19:34:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
You write a letter of inquiry to the proper court fro your satisfaction and belief.
jtm
2007-07-30 17:12:34 · answer #10 · answered by Jesus M 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋