I know that the supreme court has ruled that when cops try to get someone to sign a voluntary search of them or their residence, it must be voluntary without coercion. Now I know the mere threat of getting a warrant is not coercion, but what if an officer tells you inside an interview room at the police station that if you do not sign a consent form, they will turn this interview into a detention and obtain a search warrant because they already have enough evidence. Now the threat of a warrant is OK but the threat of detaining you, that will definitely compel someone to sign a voluntary consent to search. Even if you have nothing to hide, because to be detained for a period of time is not a good thing no matter what the outcome is. Now I am 100 percent for the police, but would you want someone searching your house, guilty or not. I know the term if you have nothing to hide, it doesn't matter, but that not the point.
2007-07-30
17:02:57
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Suzanne Orosco
1
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics