Even though diana probably would of took hard criticsm, she should of decked camilla one right in her old ugly face, dont you agree?
2007-07-30 16:41:16 · 17 answers · asked by daniel p 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
On the contrary, Camilla is the one who acted like a lady. Diana was notoriously neurotic and once pushed her stepmother down a flight of stairs. Not the behaviour of a lady.
2007-07-31 01:26:01 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Where did the verb "to of" come from? Your question makes no sense as written. If you worded it
"Diana should HAVE decked Camilla, dont you agree?
Even though diana probably would HAVE taken hard criticsm, she should HAVE decked camilla one right in her old ugly face, dont you agree? " it now makes more sense.
I don't agree anyway. The marriage between Charles and Diana was an arranged marriage as most royal marriages are. Charles followed standard practice by keeping a mistress. Diana's job was to produce children which she did. If she didn't want to be part of an arranged marriage, she shouldn't have agreed to do it in the first place.
2007-07-31 02:54:24 · answer #2 · answered by tentofield 7 · 5⤊ 4⤋
After all the heartache the Rottweiler caused Diana, two decks would be better. One for Diana, and one for the boys.
Even though Diana is in her grave (RIP) she will always haunt Camilla and the rest of the family. YIPPEE!!
2007-08-01 12:52:58 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, I think I have always felt just as bad for Camilla as I did for Diana. Neither of them really got the good end of the deal.
2007-07-31 11:47:16 · answer #4 · answered by Bex13 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
it would have been fitting to see Diana put Camilla in her place but not physically as it would be unbecoming of a lady like the other person said. and Camilla will never be a royal. for Charles to marry her is a slap in the face to Diana and her sons.
2007-07-31 03:23:10 · answer #5 · answered by chit-chaat7 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
And where would that have gotten her? Charles has always loved Camilla, not Diana. (Tho, for the life of me, I can't see why.) She would have gotten put out of that family sooner than she did, I think.
2007-07-31 01:15:26 · answer #6 · answered by kiwi 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
I pretty much agree with all of the above. I didn't want her to be gone. Bloodlines aside, Di was royal, Camilla will never be. Amen to the filly/nag one. But can you imagine having to be married to Charles?
2007-07-31 02:13:43 · answer #7 · answered by savannah 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well..it wouldn't have been wrong of her to do so. But Diana was more of a lady than that, and I'm glad she didn't sink low enough to do something like that.
2007-07-31 11:59:48 · answer #8 · answered by Elisabeth B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She did. Not only did she deck Camilla, but the whole royal family with that one swing.
She decked so hard, that she was decked back.
2007-07-31 00:32:47 · answer #9 · answered by Lighthouse 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Camilla is with Prince Charles--isn't that enough punishment for her??
2007-07-31 09:00:33 · answer #10 · answered by Pastor Chad from JesusFreak.com 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋